Does accounting/measurement of qualitative and quantitative traits regarding residents of Universe matter for known/supposed Natural Systems or Natural Systems are beyond from it. Dose Nature need it? If it matters then what can be expected need behind such project and how it can be done? What can be the expected/supposed mechanisms involved for fulfillment of such functions?
The idea of asking about the qualitative traits of residents of the Universe is a good one.
It would seem that the focus, until now, has been measurement of quantitative traits and the quantitative approach abstracts from the very thing that makes organisms interesting, namely, ability to laugh, to philosophise, to make choices, to learn, and to discover structures in the universe.
It would also seem that living organisms (residents of the Universe) spend a great deal of time recognising, analysing, and generating patterns. It is not so much a question of how much we recognise or analyse or generate patterns but rather the fact that organisms do such things that is interesting.
The idea of asking about the qualitative traits of residents of the Universe is a good one.
It would seem that the focus, until now, has been measurement of quantitative traits and the quantitative approach abstracts from the very thing that makes organisms interesting, namely, ability to laugh, to philosophise, to make choices, to learn, and to discover structures in the universe.
It would also seem that living organisms (residents of the Universe) spend a great deal of time recognising, analysing, and generating patterns. It is not so much a question of how much we recognise or analyse or generate patterns but rather the fact that organisms do such things that is interesting.
@Raja, of course Nature does not need our measurement efforts!
Thanks Vitaly Voloshin. "Dose" was written by mistake. Thanks for correction Dr Vitaly Voloshin.
Dear Demetris Christopoulos I actually want to ask that Do Nature need such measurement by itself for sustainable running of their own systems. Defiantly Natural systems must have some rules to follow and work in the universe; by such analytical thinking we might get some further clues.
Science is accounting such traits p.e. energy, entropy, time ...
But I think this is not your initial question. May be you are asking in a philosophical manner for the basic principles of nature ...
Dear Wilfried Musterle Yes you are right it’s not the initial question. Some time proven science do not support and cover many aspects of some matter. At that place the need to take help from "imagination" arises. It seems like a philosophical way and actually it is. Many times when on some specific matter researcher cant get “gathered data” then this way is much helpful to gather, develop better understanding and to sort the data.
Dear James Peters, Thanks for such a nice contribution. It was in the mind when going to write "residents of the Universe" that it will cover all kind of residents; Living & non- living with reference to intelligence level of creatures/formed structure in the Universe. It’s our classification that what is living and what don’t come under parameters/standards of living but all existed, and the thing which existed must have some properties. Human can be a superior resident but not the only resident. Universe might be functional due to Human life but it’s not only performing functions for human. As we know it was working when there was no bio-life at planet Earth. Human is for time being (even collectively the powerful societies have life not more than few thousand years) but Universe is in longer run. So the technology used to construct universe is also be more superior as compare with our technologies. I am interested to know its functions to get the deeper understanding.
Dear Jose Victor Nunez Nalda Thanks for your answer. You are right. Some time apples are already mixed with bees. in this situation we just need to draw a picture containing both for setting a goal, adjust the angle and to capture the moment. After that it’s easy to sort the apples and bees. For example here no one said there is none existence of any "Universal Management System", or there is no room for Qualitative record keeping, or what is needs of Nature from this universe etc etc. Some times for some specific matters the conventional and “proven” way of thinking don’t get fast results. Some time a blind leap works. Let’s try "Logical Imagination". Thanks again for identification & making corrections regarding my views.
Dear Raja, you wrote:"... So the technology used to construct universe is also be more superior as compare with our technologies. I am interested to know its functions to get the deeper understanding." I agree with you. It is a point that will guide you to accept the concept of our 'local universe' which is a subset of the Set of all local universes and the latter we can call it Universe with U. [I have also asked a question about why is pi=3.14159..., ie which is the 'technology' that has built that specific value]
Dear Raja, I am sorry, may be my response is not an answer to your question, but it's my association with, reflection around your question. I think whatever we do, think and feel - we influence whole world, the Universe. That's why we should be responsible in our motivations and actions, especially scientific, research activities, especially in various modifications, changes we cause (genetic ones and others). The Universe was created by Energy of Creation, Divine Love. And only those our activities are 'allowable' which tend to be filled with Love...
Dear all
We can interpret these by even the concept of positive and negative energy concept, is it???
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Philosophy