"Laws in nature are relative to consistency / constant-ness of behaviour in matters. Till the time behaviour of a particle remains alike the observation present a specific patterns and perceiver will observe same ranges of results to find out a permanent law. As the behaviour changes, by observer point of view the law automatically get change on perceiving abilities. Laws are based on nature of events, not the supreme as constant. Usually laws are just comprised on the observation of specific & repeated behaviour, the needs of structural composition & operational demands are superior to past fixed laws as new knowledge if get proven over observation then replace older. Same rule get apply on All Natural & Social Sciences and Arts as well. The laws are relative to behaviour of entity, laws are not relative to observer’s perception as permanent fixed entity. A creative consciousness has ability to bring desired change in to Natural laws......."
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313646321_Natural_Social_Laws_are_Relative_to_Behaviour_Not_a_Permanent_Entity
What you suggests and see this matter, specifically with reference to AI ?
Thanks
Article Natural & Social Laws are Relative to Behaviour, Not a Perma...
You are actually asking for the possibility or probability, if attaining or applying higher human consciousness qualifies to alter the reality of natural and social life. Concerning science, the collected puzzle pieces are not conclusive (e.g. thermodynamics, evolution and cybernetics are contradictory edifices); science to enhance economic productivity can definitely not accomplish this task of creative conscoiusness. The human intention to maximize profit via knowledge accumulation and automation will lead to further destruction of divine creation, i.e. the human learning curve and the tech-know-logical learning curve are statistically not equal. The universe does not run on profit and it is not a computer; the computer is a human creation to delegate routine labor to machines. The whole thing (connecting to eternal lawby behavioral principles) depends on human Intention, i.e. destructive consciousness can definitely alter the 'reality' on this planet. Empirically and historically, the data support the negative version of your quest. Personally, I do believe that redemption of humanity is possible (intentional change of mass behavior in the human population); as a social scientist, however, I have to tell you that the data point into another intentional direction of deeds. Consequently, let us pray for the creative direction of conscious human action by submitting to eternal law.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Science and Engineering
- Artificial Intelligence