Dear Hardev Singh Virk

Unfortunately our perception of atom is wrong. Simply, if we are smart, our DNA is smart. What make a DNA? Few atoms and molecules. therefore, an atom must be smart, and CERN must investigate an atom as whole, not by parts. In last two decades, CERN admitted that all the experiments results didn't help much. Atom is not a mechanical phenomenon to take a piece of it and smash them together is wrong, and I know, all the scientists from 1900s think atom is made of pieces, but they all are wrong. An atom is smallest intelligent unit of universe, where all the intelligent is made of few of them. When I say intelligent, it means none of them the same, even if they share over 99.99% of the same DNA like us. Non of us the same. Non of the snowflakes the same, but all made of the same water molecules. It makes none of the atom is the same, nothing in this universe is working mechanically, and nothing is the same.

. " God particle" does not exist, it is just made up thing, for same reason no one can explain it thoroughly.

https://www.academia.edu/43351041/How_the_Quantum_Universe_Works

regards

I could not appreciate your reply as U link it with DNA.

Dear Hardev Singh Virk

If you mean that a validation of the SM, gives further proof of its usefulness, I agree. But if you mean that this gives proof of the existence of its Zoo of exotic particles, then I disagree. There is so far no conclusive evidence of any of those particles.

JES

I agree with answer of Stellen Gustafsson's. Where is he working? In Greece?

Dear Hardev Singh Virk ,

Sorry,

I'm retired since some years. I was born in Sweden, but I have been working in several europeen countries. At the moment I am living close to Paris (France).

I'm developing an alternative theoretical model of fundamental physics, called "the daon theory". If you are interested, have a look in my profile (project)

JES

Very Interesting. I was in Marie Curie University, Paris (1970-72) for my doctorate in High Energy Nuclear Physics. In 1974, I changed my field as there were no high energy accelerators on India. Will look into: "the daon theory".

“…Do the recent results of CERN experiment validate the Standard Model?….”

- see SS comment in https://www.researchgate.net/project/Creative-Particles-of-Higgs-or-CPH-Theory/update/5f2bafabed60840001c591e8

Cheers

Dear Hardev Singh Virk unfortunately, you took whole things wrong.

My approach to CERN testing is, they are wrong to look at an atom as mechanical element. Atoms are smallest complete intelligent unit of universe. (unprecedented) but it is the fact.

Nothing in universe is working mechanically, but CERN testing is all mechanic. For two decades CERN smashing hadron (proton/neutron) to each other for no scientific observation. My question is WHY?

They would never gain anything by doing this procedure.

The most sad part of CERN is, all of them (scientists ) are following non-scientific science of mechanical Big bang and they are trying to use mechanic into Panpsychist Quantum Mechanics.

Here my suggestion, they should start knowing atom as whole, not by the part, and that is including space of an atom which it holding over 99.99% of an atom.

Article How the Quantum Universe Works

regards

Thanks Javed. I appreciate your reply this time. What is the link to Quantum Universe article?

The no nos have gotten hold of this thread, and for this am not a real expert.

Your best bet is to log into CERN, and try to look beyond Higgs stuff.

Thanks JUAN. I know the situation about Higgs Boson. read My Biography.