I have just completed the writing I have undertaken after receiving advice and advice regarding its corresponding prepublication.
I will submit it to a journal shortly.
I am waiting for your reactions.
Abstract :
The purpose of this publication is to demonstrate that there may be a relativistic explanation for Hawking radiation. Presented this way, it does not look exceptional, but it could lead us to model the interior of a singularity and to define its structure. The explanation in question consists of an extension of the Bardeen-Petterson Effect, a fairly simple and verifiable application of the Lense-Thirring Effect. We will call this phenomenon, at the origin of the generation of black hole radiation, the Atropic Effect, named after one of the Moirai of Greek mythology: Atropos ("the inevitable").
Although I am far from being an expert on BHs I understood the notion of your paper that is quite comprehensible. I wish you to be accepted without asking you to include at least a dozen of complicated formulas.
Dear Ioan,
I asked myself if I should at least include some LTE and BPE equations. They bring nothing new, since we just apply them mechanically, but I realized by submitting it to the eyes of some colleagues that it could indeed help better understand the concept. So I will probably do it.
Your paper seems to be trying to explain polar jets from black holes, those are a completely different topic to Hawking Radiation which would exist even for a non-rotating hole (Schwarzschild) and in the absence of any accretion disc. In that case, the radiation would be isotropic and have a thermal spectrum. Has there perhaps been some confusion over the terminology?
Dear George,
No, there is no confusion. But I knew someone would react to that. I am talking about the polar jets, indeed, and refers to Hawking's radiation by qualifying them as such. Assimilation is voluntary.
Also, it is not necessary that there is an accretion disk around the black hole so that there is accretion on the other side of the horizon of events. Maybe I should have been clearer about this.
Thank you for these questions.
AG: Assimilation is voluntary
However, altering the meaning of well-defined terms is not. Hawking radiation is a specific term that refers to a completely different phenomenon, it is a Bogoliubov transform of the so-called virtual particles of the quantum vacuum which means that while they are virtual locally, they appear real to a distant observer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogoliubov_transformation
AS: Also, it is not necessary that there is an accretion disk around the black hole so that there is accretion on the other side of the horizon of events.
Since nothing can return across the horizon (by definition, it wouldn't be an "event horizon" if any information could return), the disc has to be outside.
AG: Maybe I should have been clearer about this.
Yes, I think if you make it clear that you are talking about polar jets and not Hawking radiation, you might more responses.
Dear George,
I just would like to remember, with my limite langage skills, that Hawking radiation are not necessary explained by quantum vacuum fluctuations. Indeed, to explain black hole radiation, relativistic way is not new. You could for example get more information about Penrose process.
I updated the file Last night. You can download the new version, I think you will understand better why assimilation was voluntary with this addition of some graphical representations.
Finally, before to claim that I didn't understand fundamental concepts of my work, please be sure to have enouth information about it.
Thank you for your answer,
Alexandre.
Dear Alexandre,
AG: I just would like to remember, with my limite langage skills, that Hawking radiation are not necessary explained by quantum vacuum fluctuations.
I think that language may be the problem, "Hawking Radiation" is a name that is given specifically to the thermal emission due to transformation of quantum vacuum fluctuations, if that isn't the origin, it would be given a different name.
AG: You could for example get more information about Penrose process.
Yes, that is much more like what your are describing but again it is not related to "Hawking Radiation".
AG: Finally, before to claim that I didn't understand fundamental concepts of my work, please be sure to have enouth information about it.
I did not mean to suggest that, what I am saying is that in English, the name "Hawking Radiation" has only one meaning and it is not what you are describing. I am sure it is just a question of language though.
Last update:
https://www.researchgate.net/post/A_relativistic_explanation_for_the_evaporation_of_black_holes
Pensive it mentioned below the little serving as an example of my present research results & See into- The Universe is infinitesimal or infinite
https://shahidurrahmansikder.wordpress.com/2018/06/24/the-universe-is-infinitesimal-or-infinite/
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Publication