Esta pregunta surge en el marco de una reflexión sobre Trascendencia Humana, neuroderechos y la tensión entre avance tecnológico y ética simbólica. Busco explorar cómo la nanotecnología puede respetar la integridad del sujeto en dimensiones cognitivas, culturales y relacionales, sin reducirlo a métricas funcionales.
Aplicar bioética en nanotecnología requiere respetar la autonomía cognitiva y simbólica del individuo, garantizando transparencia, consentimiento informado y protección de la diversidad cultural. Así se promueve un avance tecnológico que preserve la integridad y libertad del sujeto sin reducirlo a simples métricas.
Uriel David Avilés Rangel: Frankly, I have no nicely formulated phrases, I can merely offer a rather down-to-earth approach, see section 4.2. of this bookchapter, almost 20 years old:
A.M. Bittner, D.K.R. Robinson, “Plant Viruses as Templates – Self-assembly, applications, and possible impact on society”, in “Nanotechnology: Development and Influence on the Society”, Societas Humboldtiana Polonorum, editors M. Jaskuła, A.M. Kłonkowski, 2008
ISBN 978-83-923622-2-7
You can ask me for a pdf, if it should be of interest. And be assured that I do not use ChatGPT just to reformulate your questions.
In applying bioethical principles to nanotechnology, especially in environmental and agricultural settings, a balanced and context-sensitive approach is essential to avoid compromising human cognitive and symbolic autonomy, as well as ecological integrity.
For example, in soil treatment, the use of nanomaterials should be carefully limited based on soil texture. Excessive application may block soil pores, adversely affecting aeration, water infiltration, hydraulic conductivity, and the physical properties of the soil. Therefore, the concentration of nanoparticles must be optimized to support the intended effect without disrupting the soil ecosystem.
Similarly, in water remediation, magnetite nanoparticles are often used due to their magnetic properties, which allow for recovery and reuse. However, the dosage should be selected carefully based on the treatment objective, to minimize potential secondary impacts on the environment.
Ethically responsible nanotechnology use requires proportionality, transparency, and ecological awareness. These considerations help ensure that innovation does not undermine environmental health or human agency in decision-making processes. Tow references:
Allhoff, F., et al. (2010). Nanoethics: The ethical and social implications of nanotechnology. Wiley.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2013.11.015
- Badges
- Science method