Our and sister universe may be oscilating. one contarcts while other expands. It may not affect overall entropic behaviour.

Thanks Prof Nandan for your input. Maybe others could add their Academic Knowhow and Expertise to this, and see if it could lead a way out of some Puzzles still existing in the "Traditional" Big Bang theory.

A great suggestion of yours, that if both are Oscillating with each other, Preserving a Constant Amount in the Total Entropy.

The idea of mine of a Sister Universe with Negative Scalars, was a Marriage of the Yin Yang idea together with quantum, black holes and the Ideas expressed by a Senior School Colleague in 1990 (during the Hubble Launch period, just before the "Desert Storm' war). This colleague Narendra De Silva, was interested in Cosmology, and at that time had a knowledge in excess of ours.

Although we did not meet again after that (I recently read his web profile as a Senior Academically qualified Electrical Engineer), one Idea of Scientists (according to Narendra) was the concepts that Cosmologists of the Eighties and Nineties proposed that Black Holes lead to other Universes, EACH Having ONE Negative Scalar.

The Only Difference here is that I made ALL Negative Scalars (Excluding the Concept of Time as a Dimension), as Features of ONE Single Sister Universe.

What you propose is one of the possible interpretations of 'parallel' Universe. There are many other options too. We can live in some projection of the Universe into a just a subspace of the whole Universe.

It is possible that our senses and measuring devices are unable to detect other parts (not necessarily dimensions) of the totality of the Universe where tremendous amounts of energy reside.

According to our understanding of the zero-point energy from quantum field theory, we are sure that down there well below what we can measure is hiding a tremendous amount of energy. Fission and fusion energies are just a scratch on the surface of this energy. So a huge amount it is.

Probably, it is good that we are unable to explore and exploit that energy because we can easily destroy the whole galaxy using it. Who knows.

Humanity is not mature enough to get this knowledge.

Thanks Jiří Kroc for your answer.

Yes what I propose IS a Parallel Universe, but it is really the Other Partner in a Pair of Universe.

As an Analogy, One could consider Our One the Brother/Husband Universe, and the "Conjoined" one the Sister/Wife Universe, based on the Orisis+Isis, ZEUS+HERA, Chronos+RHEA or Jupiter+Juno Paradigms of the Ancient Mythologies. Merger this Concept with the Yin + Yang in Eastern Philosophy, and you get a DOUBLE Universe.

There could be Trillions, Quadrillions or evens an Infinite amount of such Double Universes (or Even Triple an Quadruple Universes if we look beyong plain Yin and Yang).

In the Ancient Greek Paradigm, the First "DEITY" was CHAOS, which / who split into GAIA (Earth) and Ouranos (Sky / Heavens). Maybe this is where the Torah or Old Testament got a statement like,

In the Beginning, GOD (actually it was CHAOS) Created Heaven (OURANOS) and Gaia (EARTH).

Please NOTE that I am actually using Middle Eastern Mythologies only as Illustrations. They may Not be perfect. But they Certainly Provide a Very Interesting Comparison with a "Brother + Sister" OR "Husband + Wife" pair.

If you could compare a Creeper (Sister Universe) Wrapped around a Large tree (Brother Universe), then that could be a more Tangible Example to Explain that All Black - Holes, White - Holes, the Worm - Holes and the Common MEGA Singularity Layer, Between the Two Universes (Singularity may compare to a common "Skin" between the Tree and Creeper, formed by the merger of their two "Skins" or Barks)

Also please Note, that the above is Strictly Theoretical Physics (Without Mathematics or Experimental Evidence) connected to Ancient Yin Yang Philosophy and Proto - Judeaochristian Middle Eastern and European Mythologies.

Dear Ravi Madanayake,

What you are speaking about was explored already by an ancient civilization, which disappeared but left some bits and pieces of achieved knowledge to us.

They are Bhagavad-Gita, I Ting, Tao Te Ching, Vedanta, Kabala, and many others, which are less known in our Western world.

Cosmology described in Sanskrit texts including Bhagavad-Gita are so precise that it corresponds to our current knowledge.

Are you aware of this information? By the way, you are not the first researcher who started to explore these phenomena in Western world. One of the profound students of it was Gustav Jung who got a patient, a quantum mechanics physicists, I think it was Pauli, who later spread this knowledge among QM colleagues.

All of them were pretty aware of the treasures hidden in ancient Indian texts. Oppenheimer while observing the first atomic explosion used a quotation from Bhagavad-Gita. The hint is why?

Is this just the right place to start prior developing any other theories not based on experimental knowledge? What do you think?

Thanks Jiří Kroc for your comments.

I think the World Elite, know far more than we at Research gate do.

Consider the fact of Leonardo Da Vinchi's Flying Machines. Now Leonardo was supposed to be a Painter wasn't he?

Also, the claims of various Engineers, that NO Nation today (Not Even the United States or China) have yet developed a Technology to build the Great Pyramid of Giza, which is only One of the unexplained wonders (One single Cuboid Stone of the Great Pyramid, as I remember Weighs 12 Tons, the Weight of TWO MALE Full grown AFRICAN ELEPHANT or Maybe Two T.Rex's !!!!!!!).

There is a Pyramid in China supposed to be TWICE the Height of the Great Egyptian Pyramid, and an Even Greater one said to be in Alaska, both of these Supposedly Made Off limits to the public, the Former, by the Communist Chinese Authorities and the Latter, by either the CIA or FBI or Both.

(I think the Elite want to keep the "GOODIES" for themselves)

There are also the NAZCA Lines, and Model Aeroplanes among Ancient Artifacts of South America, and as a Sri Lankan, I can say there are many Ancient Engineering and Medical Fetes known in our country, Attributed to the Great Emperor Ravana (of the Ramayana Hindu Epic) - HE was Not an Evil Man, as the Ramayana would have you believe, the Winners write the History, and since Prince Rama probably had an even more powerful technology, and so he won, and Prince Rama's Priestly Caste, some Corrupt Ancient Brahmins, made him (Emperor Ravana) into an Evil Demon who was Lecherous, and wanting to Molest innocent women. So Ravana became "Satan" and Rama became "YAHWEH Almighty", an Avatar of the GREAT GOD Vishnu himself.

If you are Interested in this ELITE CRAZE for Technological Goodies, then you maybe Interested in the work of Dr. Joseph P. Farrell, who even deal with the NAZI experimental Science like A-Bombs at the I.G Farben, built on the blood of Jews and other victims of the concentration camps; Dr. Joseph P. Farrell also writes on Ancient Technologies :

1) https://www.amazon.com/Joseph-P.-Farrell/e/B001KCNKF4

2) https://gizadeathstar.com/

One of his Theories is that the Giza pyramid was a Death Star to Destroy Planets.

Since he is an Oxford Scholar, and Not an Ad-Hoc conspiracy theorist, I give a lot of credibility to his work.

Cheers,

Ahhhh !!!!!!!

I just Forgot to mention the Dogon people.

Just because the first Weblink SEEMS a bit Outlandish (And since I Do NOT Know of its Creators, I also give a wikipedia link).

BIBLIOGRAPHY:

1) The Dogon, the Nommos and Sirius B

http://www.unmuseum.org/siriusb.htm

2) Dogon astronomical beliefs

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogon_people#Dogon_astronomical_beliefs

All of my Above responses were to your Question:

Oppenheimer while observing the first atomic explosion used a quotation from Bhagavad-Gita. The hint is why?

Now for Another one of your questions,

>>>>>>>

Is this just the right place to start prior developing any other theories not based on experimental knowledge? What do you think?

Before going further, for most of us would great to read

Eastern Four-Valued Logic, Jain Seven Valued Logic, Nagarjuna's Eight Valued Logic

Do you have some good review papers on this subject? Actually, it is interesting.

I myself am still at the Basic Four-fold Logic Level.

This paper would be of use to you for a start

Article n−Fold mŽ −Valued Logic

I have not gone into all forms of Logic, but Researchers like

• Nandasena Gamage
• 📷Nalin de Silva
• 📷Kodandaram Kumara have a better persepective

Wikipedia also has about Tetralemma Logic

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetralemma

Also,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaina_seven-valued_logic

and

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-valued_logic

Although wikipedia is Not itself a Research, it has Links to Research Papers.