Hi Kais, as by previous excellent answers you are already well aware to the fact that for a maximum qPCR efficiency amplicons are kept smaller. The problem with longer amplicons raises when lets say you have less specific primers (which is a frequent, very common and quite disturbing issue anyhow known as primer designing) so here the longer amplicons may give you more than 1 melt peaks as they may dissociate more than 1 time due to possible secondary structures.
Also an increased length of amplicon no doubt will increase the chances of detection something not desired, which may entirely lie outside to your GOI or target.
Hence for Sybr Green assay its very important to check your primers efficiency first regardless of the amplicon length status and select the best set of primers.
Also there is an intrinsic creepy nature of Sybr Green which is its "redistribution" just after its release from the melted part of duplex during the melting phase but again into the same duplex adjacently, which is still hanging in its double stranded form and not opened yet fully as its Tm not reached. So in case of quite longer amplicons, you can say that the amount of fluorescence of SG detected by the machine is not in fact 100% corresponds to the amount of actual product or amplicon formed in the reaction. So longer amplicons, multiple issues & this is the fact, avoid it if you can.
longer amplicons decrease the efficiency of a qPCR. To be robust and comparable, the efficiency of a qPCR reaction should be between 90% and 110%.
You can always run qPCR designed for longer products, but you will need to adjust cycling conditions and do more quality assurance and troubleshooting to be confident in CT values. Also, I would tend to use SYBR green for that matter vs. probe assay on a large amplicon.
I have used amplicons up to 300bp with acceptable efficiency
However it is always better to keep between 100-200bp for consistent efficiency >85%
I have on the odd occasion tried products at 400bp (by virtue of necessity) and efficiency ~75% which is OK for efficiency corrected relative expression (pfaffl method) but this magnitude of efficiency is not ideal
Thus 100-200bp ideal; 200-300 acceptable but not optimal; > 300bp not recommended
Hi Kais, as by previous excellent answers you are already well aware to the fact that for a maximum qPCR efficiency amplicons are kept smaller. The problem with longer amplicons raises when lets say you have less specific primers (which is a frequent, very common and quite disturbing issue anyhow known as primer designing) so here the longer amplicons may give you more than 1 melt peaks as they may dissociate more than 1 time due to possible secondary structures.
Also an increased length of amplicon no doubt will increase the chances of detection something not desired, which may entirely lie outside to your GOI or target.
Hence for Sybr Green assay its very important to check your primers efficiency first regardless of the amplicon length status and select the best set of primers.
Also there is an intrinsic creepy nature of Sybr Green which is its "redistribution" just after its release from the melted part of duplex during the melting phase but again into the same duplex adjacently, which is still hanging in its double stranded form and not opened yet fully as its Tm not reached. So in case of quite longer amplicons, you can say that the amount of fluorescence of SG detected by the machine is not in fact 100% corresponds to the amount of actual product or amplicon formed in the reaction. So longer amplicons, multiple issues & this is the fact, avoid it if you can.
Namely that larger amplicons increase the probability of secondary peaks
However in the main secondary peaks; both primer diners and non specific primers are due to non optimal primers and sybr green qPCR conditions; in particular stringent annealing temp to provide maximal specificity
To Andrews these 3 points
Design primers using freeware programs that screen for hairpin loops and hetero ( primers) dimers; IDT primer design tools - both general primer design and specific qPCR primer quest tools work effectively
https://www.idtdna.com/calc/analyzer
https://www.idtdna.com/Primerquest/Home/Index
Screen primers for specificity based on BLAST search
Determine the primer Tms and evaluate primer specificity/efficiency by performing gel based PCR
Try varying the annealing temp from Tm-3C to Tm + 2C: select the most specific and efficient annealing temp from gel based PCR and also use in the actual qPCR reaction
If the qPCR reaction is a two step reaction where the annealing and extension temp are combined into one step try and design primers with Tms approximating to 65-70C such that the optimal annealing temp verified by gel based PCR and in all likelihood being Tm - 2C approximates to 65C rather than 60C: this higher temp will also reduce the likely hood of secondary non specific bands
Firstly I thank you for this wonderful discussion. I just want to add some thing:
The amplicons in real time PCR designed to be as small as possible because:
1. We need it to be very specific to avoid multi-peaks according to un-wanted annealing cases.
2. The result that we need is the Ct value not the big amplicon size as we do not need run the product on gel elctrophoreces i. e. we don't need to view bands as the measurement of results depends on Ct (Cycle of threshold) to calculate even quantity or gene expression.
3. Efficiency is just a parameter to give us indication about accuracy of our reaction.
I cannot comment specifically on the last speaker but amplicons in qPCR are made small to ensure high PCR efficiency
Efficiencies of > 85% are imperative to ensure you can accurately calculate relative gene expression based on the delta delta Ct or Livak method
This is because the Livak method in its calculations of changes in gene expression assumes a perfect doubling rate of '2' so to be valid the actual situation must approximate to this (>0.85 x2)
http://www.gene-quantification.net/livak-2001.pdf
If the actual efficiency verified by standard curve based on serial dilution of your cDNA is ~ 75% then a 'correction coefficient' should be included in the calculation by using the so called Pfaffl method:
Smaller amplicons are not in any substantial way linked to non specific amplicons: this is a function of primer design and specificity as detailed in my last answer