I’m currently conducting an experiment in which I capture amplified genomic DNA on nanoparticle surface at electrode surface, then load ruthenium solution onto the electrode to measure the DPV signal. Theoretically, if there is more gDNA, more ruthenium complexes should bind, resulting in a higher current signal.

However, in my experiments, the DPV current from the gDNA@AuNP samples is consistently lower than that of the Primer@AuNP control.

I’ve tried various approaches—such as using different DNA concentrations, adjusting nanoparticle sizes, etc.—but the signal difference remains minimal. Interestingly, when I replace gDNA with a shorter cDNA fragment (e.g., a COVID gene), the signal behaves as expected and is higher than the control.

I suspect the issue might be due to the length of the gDNA—possibly causing spatial or electrostatic hindrance that prevents the ruthenium from effectively reaching or intercalating with the DNA near the electrode. However, I’m not entirely sure. For reference, the nanoparticles are captured on the electrode surface, and the measurement is then taken via DPV.

My questions are:

  • Why might the gDNA@AuNP signal be lower than the Primer@AuNP control, despite there being more DNA available for ruthenium binding?
  • Could the length (or high concentration) of gDNA be causing electrostatic or steric hindrance that reduces the accessible binding sites for ruthenium?
  • What additional experiments or checks would you recommend to confirm this hypothesis?For example: measuring solution viscosity, adjusting ionic strength, performing controlled shortening of the gDNA, comparing with different fragment lengths, etc.
  • Any suggestions or insights would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

    More Choo Ji Hyae's questions See All
    Similar questions and discussions