The creators of the theory of fundamental interactions did not have a sense of nature. It is surprising how from a mathematical consideration of the subject arise forces, about which nature knows nothing. Why is there a strong interaction mechanism for the attraction of particles, and another mechanism exists for conglomerates of particles — gravity? If a particle has a charge property, then a third mechanism of interaction is invented for it — electromagnetism. Why does a particle need a specific mechanism for decay — weak, not reducible to three?
All these different vectors of force have only empty names, without which it would be better to do. From the emptiness of their distinctions, there arises all the confusion and absurdity in explaining phenomena. It is impossible to ascribe physical reality to that which is real only in the field of mathematics. Mathematical calculations play an extremely important role in modern physics. However, all theories are only a description of the physical image. Physics builds an ideal model, which the language of mathematics describes. However, if the model is wrong, then the mathematics will not fix it.
In the case of describing interactions, theorists calculated the wrong physical model. Moreover, the most sophisticated mathematics only confused the matter and led to the most fantastic ideas (such as asymptotic freedom of quarks and virtual particles). Today everyone decided not to break their heads over the absurdities of old ideas, just close their eyes to them. The reference to mathematics is a convenient means of ridding oneself of the labor of understanding, indicating and justifying conceptual definitions.
Dear Valery!
Your question could also be: Why has Nature created so many elementary particles?
The answer is both times the same: They are not created by nature but by theory as a sign of a significant lack of recognition!
All the classified forces are caused at least by relations and interactions of electrons and positrons on different material levels. The long-distance effects like gravity are caused sole by the electrostatic force. The short-distance effects as strong(1) and weak(2) interactions work at substructural level(1) and elementary level(2) of particles.
All real particles are at least formed by electrons and positrons. They form initially the light mesons which are for their part building blocks of all heavier particles up to atomic nuclei. Some examples for the structure of particles are:
Charged pions have the structures:
π+ (2e+ 1e−) ; π− (1e+ 2e−)
Muons are exited electrons resp. positrons:
μ+ (e+*) ; μ− (e−*)
The interaction between proton and anti-proton demonstrate their structures as follows:
p+ (π+ π− μ+) = (4e+ 3e−) ; p− (π− π+ μ−) = (3e+ 4e−)
As you can see the protons consist actual of three particles but not of 'quarks'.
Anti-matter is inverse structured matter and has nothing to do with an assumed 'anti-property' of particles.
My Regards! Hans
See more at:
Thesis The Reason of a realistic View to Particles and Atomic Nuclei
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Elementary Particle Physics
- Particle