Nowadays, fossil fuel usage, number of vehicles usage, number of industries and the people requirements are also increasing. These are guiding to increase the pollution rate to our atmosphere. I need some details about what kind of plants and trees are consuming maximum amount of polluted gas. If we cultivate these kind of plants in our globe, which can help to reduce the pollution level. So please give me some ideas and list out the plants and trees of their absorb level or ratio.
Interesting questions. I agree with Yogesh that many species have been studied to look at CO2 absorption rates, which is essentialyl ultimately going to be more or less equivalent to their growth rate. Especially plantations species have been very well documented in this area.
But I understand your question to go beyond CO2 and question what plants absorb other chemical compounds as well, NOx, SOx, maybe heavy metal compounds, etc. I donʻt know of any good literature in this area, but it might be a good idea to look at plants that have evolved in similar conditions. Areas with constant volcanic activity produce many of the same air pollution constituents that we are producing today, and some plants seem much better able to cope with high levels of these gasses than others. I donʻt know if that translates to the plants actually absorbing and storing the pollutants. One tree in Hawaii, where we have had more or less continuous volcanic activity over the 70 million year history of the islands, Meterosideros polymorpha, seems especially well adapted to survive the high NOx and SOx that accompanies volcanic emissions. It might be worth it to look if there is literature on its absorption of the pollutants.
Dear Kunal
Yes, Azadirachta indica is a more valuable plant. But we are living in the world. All the places are polluting more.. But we cannot plantation that kind trees in our earth due to copy right. Copy right thing is another problem for cultivation of these kind plantation on the earth.
copy right?.... I don't think that natural plants need copy right... may be the Azadirachta is the native plant of any country in the world but the use of plant cannot be copy righted. we can plant any plant any where. If the copy right problem still occurs... do not change the original name of the plant and use it.
Dear Kunal.
I do not know clearly about copy right things. But why do not we implement that kind of plants in all over the world for saving our earth and making good environment to our future generation.
Preferential uptake of toxic gasses is not known for any specific species. Certainly Pepal and Neem are excellent trees that can grow well in even extremes climate and can be very instrumental in cleaning air.
Trees of any shape, size or genetic origin help absorb CO2. Scientifically, it is universally agreed that the least expensive and perhaps easiest way to help offset the CO2 is to plant a tree appropriate for the given region and climate. Trees namely Common Horse-chestnut, Black Walnut, American Sweetgum, Ponderosa Pine, Red Pine, White Pine, London Plane, Hispaniolan Pine, Douglas Fir, Scarlet Oak, Red Oak, Virginia Live Oak and Bald Cypress are found to be good at absorbing and storing CO2. In Indian context, Neem, Ficus, Oake Walnut, Mahogany, Cassia; herbs like Tulsi and the woody grass Bamboos are well known CO2 sequesters and air purifiers.
Interesting questions. I agree with Yogesh that many species have been studied to look at CO2 absorption rates, which is essentialyl ultimately going to be more or less equivalent to their growth rate. Especially plantations species have been very well documented in this area.
But I understand your question to go beyond CO2 and question what plants absorb other chemical compounds as well, NOx, SOx, maybe heavy metal compounds, etc. I donʻt know of any good literature in this area, but it might be a good idea to look at plants that have evolved in similar conditions. Areas with constant volcanic activity produce many of the same air pollution constituents that we are producing today, and some plants seem much better able to cope with high levels of these gasses than others. I donʻt know if that translates to the plants actually absorbing and storing the pollutants. One tree in Hawaii, where we have had more or less continuous volcanic activity over the 70 million year history of the islands, Meterosideros polymorpha, seems especially well adapted to survive the high NOx and SOx that accompanies volcanic emissions. It might be worth it to look if there is literature on its absorption of the pollutants.
This is true that we are still lacking a very precise & concise study on specific plant with specific pollutant absorbing potential.Indeed , all plants have potential to abate the pollution.But, still tree with vast canopy size will be more fast cleanser of pollutants. Otherwise, grass land & ocean are biger sink of carbon. Since, human population at danger in present time, hence, we need to know specific plants depending for pollution abatement on particular agro climatic zone. Like Sanghi or Delhi & neary zones.
Someone has information about forests capture CO2 depending on age, kind of tree and attitude?
There are several plants that accumulate pollutant such as harmful gases from air. These includes: Neem, Ficus revoluta, Chlorophytum, Pines (Ponderosa, red, white and Hispaniolan pines), Oake (Scarlet, Red and Virginia Live Oak), Douglas fir, Bald Cypress, Common Horse-chestnut, Black Walnut, London Plane, American Sweetgum, Trembesi rain tree (Samanea saman), Bamboo, Cassia (Cassia sp), Cananga/Kenanga (Canangium odoratum), Pingku (Dysoxylum excelsum), Banyan (Ficus benyamina), Krey Payung (Fellicium decipiens), Matoa (Pometia pinnata), Mahogany (Swettiana mahagoni), Saga (Adenanthera pavonina), Areca Palm (Chrysalidocarpus lutescens), Lady Palm (Rhapis excelsa), Bamboo palm (Chamaedorea seifrizii), Rubber Plant (Ficus robusta), Dracaena “Janet Craig” (Dracaena deremensis), Dwarf Date Palm (Phoenix roebelenii), Ficus Alii (Ficus macleilandii “Alii”), Boston Fern (Nephrolepis exaltata “Bostoniensis”), Peace Lily (Spathiphyllum "Mauna Loa"), Red Emerald (Philodendron erubescens), the Lacy Tree (Philodendron selloum), the Heart-Leaf (Philodendron oxycardium), and the Elephant Ear (Philodendron domesticum or tuxla) etc.
The link below is a survey on the selection of species for pollutant sequestration. In addition to the selection of species, it is important to study the management in the initial phase of these species, when we generate quality seedlings (greater biomass, root and proportional shoot), the better the performance of the trees in the field.
Article Carbon sequestration by urban trees on roadsides of Vadodara city
There are many,but I can suggest to you these species : Azadirachta indica ,Ficus religiosa (Article Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) of some tree species gr...
)Tilia cordata (Article The Level of Particulate Matter on Foliage Depends on the Di...
)
Dear Dr. Baskar Thangaraj,
Please also see the following RG links.
Article Evaluation of Some Tree Species to Absorb Air Pollutants in ...
Article Tolerance Levels of Roadside Trees to Air Pollutants Based o...
Article Use of Some Trees to Mitigate Air and Soil Pollution Around ...
Article Effective tree species for local air quality management
Thanks!
- Pine (Ponderosa, red, white and Hispaniolan pines)
- Oake (Scarlet, Red and Virginia Live Oak)
- Douglas fir
- Bald Cypress
- Common Horse-chestnut
- Black Walnut
- London Plane
- American Sweetgum [https://sustainability.stackexchange.com/questions/786/which-tree-consumes-most-carbon-dioxide-and-poisonous-gases]
- Trembesi a.k.a rain tree (Samanea saman)
- Bamboo (Bambuseae)
- Cassia (Cassia sp)
- Cananga/Kenanga (Canangium odoratum)
- Pingku (Dysoxylum excelsum)
- Banyan/Beringin (Ficus benyamina)
- Krey Payung (Fellicium decipiens)
- Matoa (Pometia pinnata)
- Mahogany (Swettiana mahagoni)
- Saga (Adenanthera pavonina) [https://sustainability.stackexchange.com/questions/786/which-tree-consumes-most-carbon-dioxide-and-poisonous-gases]
Plants absorb carbon dioxide to grow and build biomass. Fastest growing plants and high biomass producing plant can absorb much CO2. In this regard Bamboos, claiming to produce highest biomass per unit area and time and being able to grow in diverse agroclimatic conditions, can be an appropriate candidate to mitigate CO2 and polluting gases from the atmosphere.
Pinus species are evergreen plants that has leaves throughout the year, always green.
Any trees are good, and inparticular Neem tree may be good choice.
Dear Researchers.
Its great to note the subject of CO2 fixing, etc..
It is very much required for Highways and other regions for apt remedials.
The urgent need is for remedying municipal waste-water remaining in flowing streams- Nallahs as their called in India, and stagnant- cesspools.
We have tried having Elephant grass grown in 2m by 2m floats- say in around 24 of them..In order to provide remediation and also evolve bio-mass to be used for community benefits,
The bio-mass is harvested for commercial benefits for breeding pigs, ducks, goats etc.. Duly the effluent water and the bio-produces are tested and found to be good.
There is a lot of scope of phyto-remediation using these methods.
At the influent side, to cesspool, we are assessing in having aromatic flowering plants to offset the odour from the waste- water etc.. Anyone having any experience on good aromatic flowering- plants pl do suggest.
well wishes.
Good to get information on carbon sequestration rate of various tree species. Though, Neem is a good species fast growing and host of several other species of birds and insects, but Ficus religiosa/ Pipal is reported as the best suitable species for remediation of pollution. Ficus religiosa has the capacity of releasing an organic content Isoprene in large quantity which help to prevent depletion of ozone layer, size of leaves are also comparatively big which absorbs more dust particles on it. In the state of Telangana Ficus spp have been used for road side plantations.
However, on road side plantation we have to promote three layers i.e. herbs/grasses, shrubs and trees. Shrubs cover the open bole of trees up to 3-4 m from the ground and small herbs/ grasses also bind the soil particles. Marigold (Tagettus spp) is a good species of ornamental flower and grows in rainy and winter season, other suggested species are: Ixora bracteata, Nyctanthes arbor tris-tis, Nerium spp, Gardenia spp etc.
Your answer is good to solve the pollution problem in cities with bulk population for their environment and ecosystem.
@Satvant Kaur Saini has given the clear design to have 3 cordon green-scaping ie.
Herb and grasses then shrubs and then peripheral trees. One can add IAQ improver plants for inner areas. Open terraces and balconies and others to have large potted plants.
The purpose of plant sp. too has been given.
Therefore one can design, plan and implemnt greens at a specific site for intended benefits.
Well wishes .
Plants (neem and cassia) with high photosynthesis should consume more carbon dioxide. (other gas?) However, other nutrients should be needed. Urea should be more useful than nitrate for foliar or leaf (via stomata) fertilizer application.
Adding further to notings by @ Jinda Jan-orn , Ideal and well adapted Landscaping principles and practices could be evolved clubbing the benefits and merits derived on natural greening to happen naturally, for aiding the communities.
Well wishes.
Hardwood species are better in carbon sequestration. Sometime scientifically managed grassland will outperform the forest.
I agree, in pineapple plantation such as in Hawaii, it look nice compared to sugarcane; I think pineapple also releases oxygen at nice by CAM photosynthesis.
Dave Nowak, a researcher at the U.S. Forest Service’s Northern Research Station in Syracuse, New York, has studied the use of trees for carbon sequestration in urban settings across the United States. A 2002 study he co-authored lists the common horse-chestnut, black walnut, American sweetgum, ponderosa pine, red pine, white pine, London plane, Hispaniolan pine, Douglas fir, scarlet oak, red oak, Virginia live oak, and bald cypress as examples of trees especially good at absorbing and storing CO2. Nowak advises urban land managers to avoid trees that require a lot of maintenance, as the burning of fossil fuels to power equipment like trucks and chainsaws will only erase the carbon absorption gains otherwise made.
If you want to establish trees for the long term, it's actually quite complex.
Most important thing is to select species that are most compatible to the local environment - temperature and rainfall especially. Another important characteristic is hardiness and ease to maintain, a lot of young trees die because of neglect.
And you want to plant trees that would be valued by the local community - e.g. fruit trees, so that they stand a better chance of not being cut down.
So I would suggest that CO2 absorbing capacity is rather low on the list of things to be concerned about.
Personally, if I were embarking on this in your area (Madurai?) I'd plant some quick growing leguminous species to establish ground cover (e.g. Leucaena), then plant saplings of your preferred trees under their shade.
Some of the discussion introduces ideas that are not really relevant. Yes, trees do convert CO2 into O2 when they photosynthesise, but they have a net production of CO2 through respiration when they are not photosynthesising. Leaves and other bits of the tree fall and decay, also releasing CO2. Growth of the tree sequesters carbon, but at a very slow rate. So, a growing tree is helpful but, after time trees die and release CO2. There's so much O2 in the atmosphere that the converse story about this gas is immaterial - the very small changes are dwarfed by the amount there already. A useful review of the effects of trees on CO2 is Dennis Baldocchi "The physics and ecology of mining carbon dioxide from the
atmosphere by ecosystems" Global Change Biology. 2019. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14559 There are plenty of good reasons for planting trees, but carbon sequestration occurs only in growing stands, not mature forests and is painfully slow. Mature forests hold huge carbon stores, so we don't want forest clearance. To address the current problem, however, we need to address the release of CO2 from our own actions. There, progress can be much quicker.
Hence forest itself consistently remain green regrows so that co2 sink always remain higher
Not only individual trees, but many herbaceous plants including ferns and algae species; that live within the canopies of healthy forests, and in other healthy, biodiverse, ecosystems, have the ability to absorb pollutants. I agree with calls for using local species whenever possible for these purposes. Urban foresters as well as restoration ecologists, and landscapers would do well to consider what understory plants to include when planting trees. Understory plants, adapted to the moderating effects of the canopy on light and temperature are those most likely to succeed as house plants. NASA did a study on using several kinds of houseplants to absorb benzene, trichloroethylene, and formaldehyde. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19930073077.pdf There have also been studies on using plants to absorb pollutants from water and soils. These sinks for pollutants also need cleaning and cleaning them would reduce the likelihood of those pollutants being released into or returned to the air. Willows and sunflowers take up uranium contaminants in the presence of citric acid added to soil. Article Comparison of willow and sunflower for uranium phytoextracti...
This research leaves the consideration that the condition of soils, including PH, that any plant is growing in can affect its ability to uptake pollutants. The following paper has a good explanation of how plants take up and modify pollutants and lists several species that are good at it:Article Plants as Useful Vectors to Reduce Environmental Toxic Arsenic Content
.
You know, Eicchornia spp. always grow densely in a single area and absorb more pollutant from the aquatic area moreover, CO2 from the environment. For this, Eicchornia embedded areas keep from pollution.
David Dawson is right to suggest that reduced emissions are needed in our environmental climate concern but wrong in the assessment that tree and vegetation is insignificant as a source remediation. IPCC suggests that both sequestration and emission reduction are needed related to deceleration of climate change. Vegetation and soil management are very much about to stimulate very significant helpful carbon and nitrogen sequestration and help the overall balance of climate and environmental quality. I agree with Mr. Moniruzzaman in the assessment that plant communities are more effective than any single plant species and the importance of biodiversity. In a heating world a single tree can transpire over 1000 liters of water in a single day. The shade and cooling from the living tree is viable way of coping with many issues related to our warming environment it addressing the taking out of excess greenhouse gases while mitigating many of the worst issues related to global warming. In the context of global warming adaptation our abuse of our soil environment has led to impoverishment of soil organic matter levels by well over one half of the origin amount. The management of our vegetative cover along with vegetation give a viable way when combined with a transformed use of energy to address the existential issue of climate change from accelerated enrichment of our atmosphere with greenhouse gases.
If some plants and trees consume the maximum amount of polluted gases in the atmosphere you can eat the fruits and plants. Sorry you are wrong Virendra Kumar Saxena and why they eat Tulsi. Were is the poisoning?
Devanand, I mean trees/ plant giving fresh air in the atmosphere.
Horse-chestnut, black walnut, American sweetgum, ponderosa pine, red pine, white pine, London plane, Hispaniolan pine, Douglas fir, scarlet oak, red oak, Virginia live oak, and bald cypress as examples of trees especially good at absorbing and storing CO2
Following plants/trees may have capability to consume/absorb polluted gases :
Pine, Oake, Douglas, Neem, Peepal, Black walnut, Bamboo, Cassia, Banyan Matoe , Saga and many more.
I think the question must be considered also in terms of the plant metabolic rate (especially gas exchange in the stomata) of the certain plant species in the certain environmental conditions. The optimum pollutant consumption in the same species may vary. Thus, in various condition (i.e.climatic zone, etc.) different species (plant communities) provide maximum consumption. Even a 'good consumer' species could hardly do it well near the edge of its distribution area, in unfavorable conditions.
The discussion on this question would lead to ideal concepts in landscapping.
Plants foliage apt for rapid absoption of CO2 may be used for spaces on sides of heavy traffic lanes at ground to 3m above level.
Trees and their leafage for levels 3m to 6m level or higher.
Indoor AQ improver plants for inner spaces.
Likewise, we could evolve a strategies for low and lower sunlight availability.
Corridor, tunnels in buildings, balconies and open terrace spaces may also be assessed for apt taxonomic inputs for carrying out bio-remediation.
Well wishes.
Following plants/trees may have capability to consume/absorb polluted gases : Pine, Oake, Douglas, Neem, Peepal, Black walnut, Bamboo, Cassia, Banyan Matoe , Saga and many more.
Great discussion since long, and I find that tree species preference matters from the climatic zone and site suitability as many of the group members@@ have mentioned this. But overall observation shows that Neem, Peepal, Banyan are some of the common trees as far as the rate of pollutant absorbent is concerned.
Satvant kaur Saini That tree species are not very common in Taiga or Prarie for example =) Thus, you can't conclude this from the 'overall observation' . At least a broad geographic reference is needed.
Increase the canopy by suitable species will reduce the presence of pollutants from atmospher and will increase oxygen concentration
all trees and plants can adsorb CO2 during photosynthesis process. But as Yogesh mentioned, some species including: Common Horse-chestnut, Black Walnut, American Sweetgum, Ponderosa Pine, Red Pine, White Pine, London Plane, Hispaniolan Pine, Douglas Fir, Scarlet Oak, Red Oak, Virginia Live Oak and Bald Cypress are known to be good adsorbents to capture CO2.
Ideally, you should plant a quick-growing species which not only has good foliar exchange; it should produce a wood product which can be used to either sequester carbon, e.g. building material, or provide a means to reduce fossil fuel use, as in cellulosic alcohol.
Foliage dies and releases Co2 at night. A better measure is quick growth of secondary xylem, wood. Gram per gram, this will be the highest and most durable form of carbon capture, if the wood is not allowed to simply decay. Additionally, seek species which do not require fertilizer, such as those which fix nitrogen. Insect pest resistance is also important.
Ironically, it is often the case that imported, invasive species can accomplish superior sequestration due to their lack of natural controls and their rampant growth. In a program where escape is prevented and the non-native species already present in an area, it could be possible to, e.g. harvest before seed production and produce a carbon-captured product, such as particle board, from routinely harvested young trees. Young trees, as they build faster mass of secondary xylem, usually have a point where they attain more mass per year than older, mature trees.
It's far better, of course, to begin by examining native species and using those which best satisfy the above criteria. I mention the exotics because of personal experience. In our temperate climate, Ailanthus altissima is an invasive which we cut down and use to heat our home, negating the need for convention heat sources which are fossil fuel-driven.
If make attempt not to reduce the greenery will be a good contribution to the man kind/socienty.
Of course, preserving whole forest ecosystems provides a tremendous diversity of pollutant breakdown or capture possibilities, as microorganisms associated with ecosystems can contribute to pollutant mitigation. Here, the constant genetic flux of bacteria, fungi, lichens, algae, etc. provide myriads of enzymes, biological pathways, which often drift towards utilization of available chemicals.
Which plants absorb or sequester the most pollutants will depend on identifying which pollutant(s) one is referring to. Sulfur Dioxide, for example, can be converted to Sulfates in soil or humus, which are then available for organisms to use. Co2 is, perhaps, one of the easiest pollutants to capture.
In South Africa, we have the spekboom ( Portulacaria Afra) which has a significant carbon storage capacity.
Carbon offsetting via trees is an effective contributor but not the sole answer to rising air pollution. However its a fact that something is better than nothing.
The best of my knowledge,
1. Poplar tree with carbon offset rate of 7 tones/ha/year for a period of 26 years.
2. Conifer tree with carbon offset rate of 3 tones/ha/year for a period of 55 years.
3. Hardwood with carbon offset rate of 2 tones/ha/year for a period of 90 years.
Reference paper:
Cannell, M.G.R. (1999) Growing trees to sequester carbon in the UK: Answers to some common questions. Forestry. 72 (3), pp. 237–247. doi:10.1093/forestry/72.3.237.
Leavy and green vegetations absorb Carbon IV oxide and convert it to man's food
Plants absorb polluted gases and improve the air quality. Oak is the most carbon absorbing tree. The common horse chestnut is a good carbon absorber. Ficus religiosa (peepal tree) purifies the air most. Other trees included in the list are pine, maple, neem, banyan, Cassia and eucalyptus.
May be the tress like Banyan, peepal, neem are the main which absorb maximum pollution and many more also..............
I like snake plant because it is easy to grow, please see,
Wei, X., Lyu, S., Yu, Y., Wang, Z., Liu, H., Pan, D., and Chen, J. 2017. Phylloremediation of Air
Pollutants: Exploiting the Potential of Plant Leaves and Leaf-Associated Microbes. Front. Plant Sci. 8:1318. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01318
Wolverton, B.C., Johnson, A., and Bounds, K. 1989. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE PLANTS FOR
INDOOR AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT. FINAL REPORT-SEPTEMBER 15, 1989. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, John C. Stennis Space Center, Missouri, USA.
Tulasi, peepal, neem, bargad, fern trees, ashok and many more .
Munira Nasiruddin thank you for your clear answer. Would you mind sharing your scientific sources ?
i believe plants that have more leaf area index that absorbs more pollutants...
In the current climate, we’re regularly inundate from all sides about pollution, minimizing our ecological footprint and protecting our environment. At times it can be overwhelming to know where to even start! In addition to our regular duties of reducing, reusing and recycling, have you thought about planting trees? Read on to discover how planting trees can make an enormous, positive contribution to the health of our environment!
In general dark green colour leaves of tall tree or small plant consume pollutant gases. A study showed, tulsi, pipal, bargad, various types of fern trees consume more polluted gases.
Plants with large amount of biomass such as Ficus religiosa, Ficus benghalensis, Sammanea samman, Albizzi lebbeck, Tamarindus indica, Ponamia pinnata etc are the best absorbers of polluted gases. They will be found to grow in all type of environments.
I think those species that Have the greatest leaf surface.
Anyway it is an interesting question in a climate change scenario
There are plants listed in the literature for Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) - Where: A=Ascorbic acid content (mg/gm), T=Total chlorophyll (mg/gm), P=pH of the leaf extract, R=Relative water content of leaf. Generally, deciduous plants score over evergreen due to the periodic leaf shedding and the fresh foliage accounting for additional amounts of gaseous emissions. You may please browse through the literature, please.
Oak is the most carbon absorbing plant. The common horse chestnut (Aesculus spp.) is also a good carbon absorber. Dracaena plants is one of the most efficient air filters. Peepal (Ficus religiosa) purifies air. Besides, pine, neem, bamboo. Cassis, banyan and Eucalyptus trees also absorb carbon from air.
Trees provide a large leaf surface onto which particles are deposited and gases are removed. Pollution is removed by nearly all parts of a tree; the soil, roots and vegetative portions of the tree species. Trees respirate and exchange gases through stomates, or holes, on their leaves; these gases include those necessary for the tree’s functioning as well as other gaseous air pollutants. Once inside the leaf, gases diffuse into the spaces between the cells of the leaf to be absorbed by water films or chemically altered by plant tissues. Trees also reduce air pollution by intercepting airborne particles and retaining them on the leaf surface, called dry deposition. Some can be absorbed by the leaf surface itself, although most remain on the plant surface7 . Leaf surfaces are most efficient at removing pollutants that are water soluble including sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and ozone. Pollutants travel through plants by translocation via the xylem and phloem. Chemical pollutants absorbed by the leaves are translocated to the root areas where they can be broken down by microbes in the soil and pollutants absorbed by the roots can be broken down and translocated to the leaves where they are released into the atmosphere
spekboom is the best carbon sink especially in sand soil
check the scientific source : Sarah-Jane Paviour wrote on it in her 2014 thesis on properties of spekboom.
The plants with large canopy and high biomass are having the capacity to absorb more polluted gases present in that environment. The plants like Pine, Oake, Douglas, Neem, Peepal, Black walnut, Bamboo, Cassia, Banyan Matoe , Saga and many more. Banyan, peepal and neem trees are more useful in absorbing higher amount of polluted gases.
Instead of canopy, the type of forests and the types of plants are important in absorbing the pollutants present in the atmosphere. Deciduous plants are considered the better plants to absorb large amount of pollutants. This view is according to my knowledge.
I think that evergreen forest trees with large biomass can consume the largest amounts of polluted gases.
I am of the same opinion as the points made by YOGESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI
Neem, fern , pipal, tulsi, bargad
Are well known for consuming polluted gases.
If we consider the increase of greenhouse gases as pollutant the ability of plants to capture and maintain carbon transferring it to a long term soil reserve is critical. The ability to generate humus is the critical function. Soil organic matter is able to help the gaseous environment but is also cirtical to water relations and the ability to buffer soil toxicity. The velvetbean plant is highly effectivie in increasing soil organic matter it can do this based on the high l dopa content that is not easily decayed. Mexican sunflower is another stellar plant in stimulating the ability to increase soil organic matter in short time frames. When soil organic matter is acheived in the soil the increases of toxicity are ameliorated and the most growth facter water is attenuated.
Because of fast urbanisation, such trees are disappearing. Scope for polluted gases becoming more.
The best way to quickly adsorb CO2 from the atmosphere and lock it up in biology is through the stimulus of massive algal blooms in the oceans. Yes I know that this is a controversial topic, but it is the best and less expensive way of doing it. I have read most of the critics and the truth about their comments is that they don't understand the issue. Many have said that they are not in favour of "Geoengineering", bu we have geoengineering the planet for centuries with the dumping of CO2 into the atmosphere. I have heard may arguments against this technique, but nonviable solution to the problem. I have read about artificial trees, spinning mirrors into space around the earth, injecting sulphur dioxide high into the atmosphere, etc. etc., but none of there are practical, controllable or even economically feasible. Yes there have been some false starts, some unscrupulous players trying to profit by this, and frankly mountains of fear. It is time to revisit this initiative. Please remember that 50-65% of the oxygen we breath comes from the oceans, and it is produced by plankton.
In modern megacities – a huge number of cars. Think about it, for a year, one "iron horse" emits about a kilogram of metal into the atmosphere. That's why we need parks and squares. Green spaces are not only pleasing to the eye, they protect against harmful environmental influences. Trees and shrubs absorb dust, carbon dioxide, and produce oxygen. We present to your attention the TOP 5 trees that best "clean" the air.
In the first place – poplar. It can be safely called a record holder for environmental benefits. Wide and sticky leaves of this tree successfully retain dust, filter the air. In addition, poplar grows quickly, actively gaining green mass and humidifies the air around. The oxygen released by one adult tree per day is enough for 3 people to breathe during the same time.
a special advantage of poplar is its unpretentiousness and resilience. It survives along highways and near Smoking factories. Linden and birch trees usually die in these conditions. There are benefits from poplar fluff – it is also a kind of dust collector.
I think Veit-ver grass and elephant grass were best Pollutant absorbents
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Plant Sciences