In the Wikipedia page for Short Linear Motifs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_linear_motif), the first definition is attributed to Tim Hunt in 1990: "The sequences of many proteins contain short, conserved motifs that are involved in recognition and targeting activities, often separate from other functional properties of the molecule in which they occur. These motifs are linear, in the sense that three-dimensional organization is not required to bring distant segments of the molecule together to make the recognizable unit. The conservation of these motifs varies: some are highly conserved while others, for example, allow substitutions that retain only a certain pattern of charge across the motif.”
The problem is that Hunt did not appear to write these words. If you follow the citation and get the PDF from Science Direct, the source is an unattributed editorial box highlighting a new series in the journal about SLiMs. It ends: "We are indebted to Tim Hunt, who first suggested this series..." - therefore I think it is unlikely that Hunt was the author. I am also somewhat doubtful that this really was the first definition of a linear motif as they were clearly already being studied and recognised - this is not a proposal for such recognition.
Does anyone know who the author of this quote was? (I cannot find who the editor of TIBS was in 1990.) Furthermore, does anyone know of an older quote alluding to "linear motifs" as a discrete class of functional protein sequence elements?