To give you a breif summary of my work, I am mostly looking at the percentage time a participant spends in a certain play state when compared to the entire observationn duration. I was using parametric measures to analyse the data provided that all assumptions were met. However, I have recently come across CoDA (Compositional Data Analysis) and a recent study which shows significant differences between standard tests and CoDA tests. My question is whether it is neseccary to redo my data analysis or whether it would be ok to continue using standard testing meassures. Most instructions on CoDA also get a little bit too technical for me to understand. I have been struggling to really wrap my head around the differences betweeen the methods and how to accurately do CoDA. I am attaching the paper citation mentioned for your reference.

Gupta, N., Mathiassen, S. E., Mateu-Figueras, G., Heiden, M., Hallman, D. M., Jørgensen, M. B., & Holtermann, A. (2018). A comparison of standard and compositional data analysis in studies addressing group differences in sedentary behavior and physical activity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 15(1), 53.

More Kiyoshi Bhuiyan's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions