My research contradict most of the "recognized knowledge", revealing intentional lies centuries-old. Generations of scholars had built their little "boutique" (including conferences and publications) accepting those obvious lies and building up fragile justifications and thesis to explain a scientific way those accepted lies. How do you think they would consider my work, if not by pure rejection? How can I ask any of those (that capitalize knowledge) to review neutrality or even read a professional way my texts and works? How can I except to be cited, when probably, they would rather spit me off? What should I do? Shut up? Not my style.
Dear Fred Romano nice discussion. Thanks for bringing up here. If you believe something you have to follow it, no matter criticism you may have. Crash the taboos or lies. Just follow “ the truth” Your persistence would pay off eventually and your work would be accepted somewhere sometime in the future...
“give up giving up”
kind regards,
Emre
I guess , one should voice their strength never mind the way in which it is received...
Dear Professor,
I strongly Believe that you must surely fine one editor and 2-3 reviewers of your field who are thinking the same way you do and may be ready to publish your findings despite the implication on the previously existing articles.
I am sure that if a recent article point out limitations of any theory established by earlier researchers like Einstein for instance, it will attract the interest of a high number of scientits, so there is a high chance for your paper to be published provided the editorial board agree.
By the way I am already curious to read that article; it might change the direction of science…. Please do not shut up, continue finding the right journal
Good researchers routinely tilt at accepted wisdom. Live long, longer than them, and prosper.
The point is precisely I'm considered as terminal (since 17 years). That's why I'm unsure to live longer. So I try to gain density. Like black matter: as much they resist me, as much grows my volume and force.
Dear Fred Romano ,
May Allah bless you 🙏
Best wishes ,Regards , and Respect.
I had guessed, Fred. But you cannot control the future. Deal with the present and allow the future to deal with you.
Dear Fred Romano nice discussion. Thanks for bringing up here. If you believe something you have to follow it, no matter criticism you may have. Crash the taboos or lies. Just follow “ the truth” Your persistence would pay off eventually and your work would be accepted somewhere sometime in the future...
“give up giving up”
kind regards,
Emre
I personally think that Popper's falsifiability principle is an excellent yardstick for measuring the worth and value of scientific claims.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Cognitive Science
- Thinking