Calculation of the RG score for all of us is an enigma; we have summarized it in our correspondence more often, but do we have at least some knowledge or a conclusion regarding the above question?
Since I write a lot on RG , my score is indicative of that !!!! My Research interest is a score for papers and its citations (I guess) . Again my score goes up only when I write technical stuff else it will increase marginally (0,1) range ...
I sincerely thank you for all your answers to my question. Dear, please excuse me that I can not recommend at least one , because I respect all equally.
I believe RG is the way mark for individual knowledge & members certain part & take the knowledge of others by remaining in their performance. With this some times the knowledge & RG some time offers us the knowledge of our experience or helps us to process under our project for this sometime back I have expressed my views in the similar line which I submit herewith for your perusal
It is of course an individual member of a researcher to follow & joint in the suggestive measure for collaboration as been observed that quite good project which has been presented as part of researcher program if any member can tune with the same he may certainly suggest for his well experience ,knowledge also for suggestive measure for collaboration .
I do not know how to calculate the increase of points but there is more important than points which is increasing the general culture here at the researcher and that
For his communication and discussion of many ideas and in many areas
Really, very interesting answers. I thank you all. I will not make an injection with any of you, because everyone has an opinion that I really respect.
Segun Michael Abegunde it is not normal. By the way, why has RG failed to disclose their rating/scoring indices or pattern, also, there are a number of journals that have high IF even with citation reports, yet RG does not recognize them. It would interest you to know that RG scores for their indexed journals are inconsistent with those of reputable databases, though it is stated that they base their own on RG cited papers.... In summary, RG cannot stand reputably relative to known established databases which give timely updates on their citation reports. Most RG journals are less rated comparably and this is a factorial index militating against some scores.
I agree with Emre Pakdemirli. But when to listen to my friend ( Dr.Fares) and answers to question, increase of recommendation and follow-up, my score improve.
Thanks to all of you who dedicate part of your free time to my question. Your various answers stimulate my thinking on the subject. I'm glad to get information from people from different countries of the world.
Thanks for all your answers and all your tips. I hope this is useful not only for me, but for all others who follow my questions. By "socializing with you within the question" now I really have a different sense of the topic we are discussing.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I am glad that in these warm days I have kept your attention to my questions. I will not argue with you all about your answers because I respect every opinion, I will just give you a big thank you. Greetings from me to all of you