I mean is there a relationship between the components of the organizational culture for example - Bureaucratic style - Rules and regulations - Centralized management - Lack of authorization and the application of TQM in government institutions ?
Absolutely yes organizational culture impact TQM both in private and government institutions. Organizations are made up of people and their relationships with one another and interact with one another to perform essential functions to attain common goal.
In my previous organisation, when TQM culture was adopted the organisational culture has changed from "the boss is always right" to a more interactive culture because in your everyday interactions everybody feels that the other party is their customer. In TQM, customers are not just clients from outside the organisation but also between an employer and employees within the organisation.
culture is the least common belief which comes after generations of discipline and nursing of values. It can be prevalent in an organisation or in a family.
With TQM ( processes, individualised controls with and responsibility and authority, and customer focus as Aminuddin suggests), the culture may be set for a beating??
Any Change is resisted, and gets a beating at the hands of smart people.
There is a direct relationship between the organizational culture and TQM implementation as Total Employee Involvement, Employee Empowerment, Employee Ownership, Management Through Teams; some of the most important requirements for TQM implementation; will not be able to prosper. Therefore, Bureaucratic style comprising of Rigid Rules and regulations, Centralized decision making, absence of delegation of authority all hamper implementation of TQM. In fact TQM implementation requires entrenchment of Quality Culture in the organization. Therefore, Government organizations having Bureaucratic set up find it difficult to implement and sustain TQM.
a system for controlling or managing a country, company or organization that is operated by a large number of officials who are employed to follow rules carefully:
I had to deal with the university's bureaucracy before I could change from one course to another. "
TQM sure prescribes limits: of customer satisfaction, responding to specs, process mandates - following rules carefully. TQM is a system, as a culture, conforming to PDSA, working as a group/ team (large number of officials).
Possibly the size of organisation, and the Culture (attitude to Customer Internal and External / Orientation), matter.
The Wrong Intent is what makes bureaucracy in common use:
"DISAPPROVING": The company was inefficient because it was highly bureaucratic.
A comment of type
"I had to deal with the university's bureaucracy before I could change from one course to another".will arise when the student is unnecessarily harassed. [customer Focus denied?] may be it was due to reanalysis of rules, and involved correction and implementation of CA/PA - the latter sports TQM.
May be the top leadership is committed, and strict, some name it bureaucracy?
There are at least four principles of TQM on which the impact of organizational culture in government institutions is obvious and easy to demonstrate: customer focus, leadership, employee involvement and continuous improvement.
In government institutions, culture of centralized leadership is contradictory with the principle of participatory leadership of TQM. Bureaucratic system is contradictory with employee involvement and customer orientation principles.
So, the implementation of TQM in such organizations requires a change in leadership style and more organizational flexibility.
The New Public Management (NPM) could help to implement TQM in government institutions.