In principle, you can use different standards, in particular those produced by NIST (USA). I think, the most convenient way is to use thin glass capillaries (about 0.1-0.2 mm diameter) filled with the reference powder (external standard). LaB6 is quite convenient as it possesses primitive cubic lattice and so has sufficient number of the Bragg peaks. Si or Al2O3 powder also may be recommended. If the sample-to-detector distance is quite large in comparison with the sample size, then the absorption is not so crucial to produce serious peak position shifts.
Please include additional relevant topics for enhanced circulation and feedback from RG members. See example of relevant topics (up to 15) in the attached RG query.
I'm not yet aware of any NIST standards specifically used for transmission diffractograms. The idea of using powder standards in capillary is the proven conventional approach. However, the orientation/alignment of the sample capillary will be critical for precision.
Post details of your XRD experimental arrangement along with some actual data to make things interesting to readers and contributors. Especially, details about the 2D detector (make/model/link) and some of your live data if possible
Characteristics of an "ideal standard sample" would include the following (in my opinion):
Known, predictable, invariant diffraction pattern
Annealed state to minimize stress/strain effects.
Exhibiting continuous "sharp" Debye-Scherrer Arcs/Rings. Appropriate particle/grain size will aid.
Minimal "preferred orientation" effects.
Shown below are some examples of real time 2D diffractograms from samples including powders, foils, fibers, etc. in the transmission Laue mode. These diffractograms were acquired at small SDD (sample to detector distance) in the range of 5-25 mm. Even the house-hold aluminum foil with its preferred orientation may serve as a "standard" as long as its pattern is predictable and repeatable. Note the example of NIST LaB6 powder standard in capillary obtained from BNL (Synchrotron) in the transmission mode at 100 mm SDD.
What SDD are you employing?
What is the spatial resolution and dynamic range of the 2D detector you are utilizing?
Suggestion: Try a known thin foil in transmission as a standard!
I'd think, ideally, the standard should be of similar dimension and morphology as the subject sample, i.e., powder for powder, foil for foil, fiber for fiber :-)
"Spinning the capillary" can certainly be used to integrate the 2D signal and find the time average. The LaB6 example above illustrates capillary spinning in the synchrotron. It is more fun to examine individual DD (diffracting domain) by recording and examining the rocking curve for the powder :-)
Practically, it may be a lot easier to orient a poly crystalline thin foil perpendicular to the beam than to find a "sweet spot" on the capillary and orient it along the diffractometer axis. I'm yet to try. I will soon.