RevMan | Cochrane Training

Fabiola Sáez-Delgado You may try Rayyan for screening and identifying duplications. It has an option to directly upload the Pubmed file, also.

https://rayyan.ai/

R can also be used for systematic review. Here is a link.

http://meta-evidence.co.uk/systematic-review-meta-analysis-and-r/#:~:text=Using%20R%20to%20write%20the%20search%20strategy&text=Eliza%20Grames%20has%20created%20litsearchr,retrieved%20by%20a%20scoping%20search

Fabiola Sáez-Delgado

Check these link may be helpful:

https://uow.libguides.com/systematic-review/tools

https://ktdrr.org/resources/sr-resources/tools.html

I agree that R and Revman are two effective and accessible (free download from internet) software packages for Meta-Analysis. They can also provide good images of the outputs of your analysis.

In the preparatory stages of the literature review, it can be useful to do the selection and 2-reviewer blind assessment process through a central database. Covidence is good for this (https://www.covidence.org/). You can import the results from various literature search engines direct into Covidence, build a reference list, and share this with your co-authors. Covidence has the different stages of the literature review and selection process built into it, so that y0u can track the stages of the PRISMA and produce a good flow diagram of the review/selection process. (Import, screen title and abstract, screen full text, quality assessment, check reviewer consensus, "conflict" resolution, inter-rater reliability and limit of agreement, data extraction,)

After that, Revman or R are useful for the analysis of the literature data that you ahve selected.

We use Covidence and I like it! Similar to Rayyan https://www.covidence.org/

Hello, I've been using Asreview for a while, it makes the initial selection of articles a lot easier https://asreview.nl/lab/

I don't know if https://www.rayyan.ai/ is the best but I only used it. is pretty good!

Dear respected researcher,

I think "Scholarcy" platform might help you to perform a systematic review regarding your research works.

All the best.

https://www.scholarcy.com/

I have found "Covidence" very helpful.

I think "scholarcy" and "Covidence" will probably help you regarding the systematic literature review.

I have tried out a few and found https://picoportal.org/ very helpful and reliable for abstract and full text screening. Also there is a free version available.