20 December 2023 2 9K Report

I would like to ask a question about constructing stable cell lines.

If someone has the whole genome sequencing results of their overexpression stable cell line that would be really helpful. That would give us a clear solid example of what going on during the fregment integration steps.

  • I would like to ask, when using vector transfection to construct stable cell lines, is gene recombination inclined to randomly insert the entire part of the transfected vector into one random position (I mean a whole block integrated into the genome, the target gene and the resistance gene will be integrated near by as they were in plasmid). Or is it inclined to random integration, that is, the target fragment and the resistance gene are integrated in different spots? In addition, in the final cell line obtained, how many copies of the fragment are integrated into the genome? (Because the results we often get like, final seed 30 clones that can survive under puromycin, but only 3-5 contain the target fragment, which seems to answer this question, that is, random fragments of random integration are high probability events in this case.)
  • Online information has reported that, due to the LTR sequences on the lentiviral vector, during gene recombination, the whole sequence between LTR can be integrated into a specific sequence position of the genome, could someone help me to double confirm this information?
  • About the role of resistance genes, could we understand it in this way? 1). In the overexpression period (2-7 days after transfection), screen out the clones that have not been successfully transfected; 2). In the integrated period (2-14 days after transfection), screen out the clones that have not successfully integrated the resistance gene. 3). After the stable cell line is constructed, maintain the purity of the single-cell clone. Am I right? I suppose that if random fragments of random integration theory is right. Then I would not expect that all the puromycin-resistant cells all have my target gene overexpressed.
  • I saw a product sells on the takara website which are linearized resistance markers used for co-transfection with other overexpression vectors. I thought that linear resistance markers would increase gene integration efficiency, then it may indirectly increase the probability of simultaneously integrating the interested fragment and the resistance gene in the same cell(may in different spots of genomic). Compared to those methods that transfect vectors contains resistance gene, above linearized resistance markers co-transfection methods would have more 'positive' cell clones to survive(have both interested gene and resistant marker) , then increasing the possibility of getting those clones.
  • In those easy transfect cells, such as HEK293 or CHO-K1, the transfection efficiency can easily reach more than 95%, so can we understand it in this way? Compared to co-transfecting overexpression plasmid along with a linearized resistance marker, to a vector containing both resistance marker and target fragments, for a single cell, the possibility to get both interested gene and resistant marker is almost the same, right? 95%*95%=90.25%
  • Thank you for your reading, and please let me know if I did not make my idea clear. It would be really helpful if you answered my question.

    Best,

    Le

    More Le Chang's questions See All
    Similar questions and discussions