Rule 1: Make It a Driving Force.

Rule 2: Less Is More.

Rule 3: Pick the Right Audience.

Rule 4: Be Logical.

Rule 5: Be Thorough and Make It Complete.

Rule 6: Be Concise.

Rule 7: Be Artistic.

Rule 8: Be Your Own Judge.

Steps to organizing your manuscript

1)Prepare the figures and tables.

2)Write the Methods.

3)Write up the Results.

4)Write the Discussion. Finalize the Results and Discussion before writing the introduction. This is because, if the discussion is insufficient, how can you objectively demonstrate the scientific significance of your work in the introduction?

5)Write a clear Conclusion.

Write a compelling introduction.

Write the Abstract.

Compose a concise and descriptive Title.

Select Keywords for indexing.

Write the Acknowledgements.

Write up the References.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3474301/

I agree with Faraed Salman.

Make sure to follow authors guidlelines of the journal.

Discussion part should reflect resutls interpretation of current study and comparison with previous and/or other current studies. It should also include limitations section and recommendations for future studies.

Abstract should be concise, informative, and specific.

Methods should be reported thoroughly and interventions (when used) should be described well.

Rationale of the study should be stated clearly and objective(s).

Writing style is key! Beware to use the proper writing style such as APA.

Make sure to cite more recent studies in manuscript as many journals require that.

Choose a proper title and keywords that reflect your area of interest and focus of paper.

Hi @Tanvir Singh

There are several tips for writing a good science paper, here are seven key points:

1- Selecting the appropriate topic and determining the general purpose of writing the article

2- Planning and determining the appropriate schedule

3- The correct structure of the ISI article

4- Editing and final evaluation of the article

5- Specialized translation of the article

6- Selecting a suitable and valid journal to submit an article

7- Paying attention to the instructions of the desired magazine

Good luck

I totally agree with Dr Hassan Izzeddin Sarsak

Know the journal or audience you are writing to, and avoid doing research on your own passion.

Avoid complex and active sentence.

Basing on journal I have selected, it must have instructions for authors so follow them

Write in a simplified language you best understand

have intro, methodology, results, discussions and conclusions as present sections

avoid writing like the papers you are reading

do not submit your work in predatory journals

The guidelines to follow are to have a concise and catching topic that reflect the totality of the study. The study must be scientific and logical by stating the problem and gap analysis with right audience in focus. It must be brief and avoid any form of ambiguity with a link to a theory and use of relevant statistical tool where necessary. Reference should be made to relevant and current journals if possible. It must have a good conclusion and policy recommendation as contribution to knowledge.

Research ethics is an important and fundamental thing

Thank you for your valuable comment Faraed Salman and Dr.Hikmat Abdulkarim Almadhkhori

Thank you for your valuable comment Faraed Salman and Dr.Hikmat Abdulkarim Almadhkhori

Thank you for your valuable comment Faraed Salman and Dr.Hikmat Abdulkarim Almadhkhori

Thank you for your valuable comment Hassan Izzeddin Sarsak and Zineb Bellahreche

Thank you for your valuable comment Majid Jangizehi , Sana MH Al-shimmary and Remi Chukwudi Okeke

Thank you for your valuable comment Md. Israt Hasan , Mhd. Syahnan and Bruce Robin Nyamweha

Thank you for your valuable comment Joan Nyika , Adekoya A. Augustine and Yousif Yaqoob Yousif

I think it should be simple, in flow, understable to larger audience and need to be interesting and applicable...

Thank you for your valuable comment Roshan Singh Thagunna

Introduction should clearly bring out the problem/gap(s). Thereafter, methodology should be clearly explained, including statistical analysis (which should be appropriate for such a study). Results and discussion requires extensive comparison with previous studies as well as genuine interpretation of the analyzed data. Conclusions and recommendations for further studies can e brought out.

I strongly second the views of Dr. Hikmat

The most important thing during writing the scientific article is avoid plagiarism by citing research and give the text your own style. The basic guidelines can be summarized by the following: Organize research and use article writing templates, compose a descriptive title, write a compelling introduction via literature survey and show the purpose of the study, “the aim”, communicate the results, interpret them, and support them by a clear conclusion.

The guidance/guidelines as per the following publications may further help:

• Bern, D. J. (2009) Writing the empirical journal, in Zanna, M.P. and Darley, J.M. (eds.) The Compleat Academic: A Practical Guide for the Beginning Social Scientist. 2nd ed. London: Psychology Press, pp. 171-201.
• Cargill, M. and O'Connor, P. (2009) Writing Scientific Research Articles: Strategy and Steps. West Sussex, UK Wiley-Blackwell.
• Derntl, M. (2014) Basics of research paper writing and publishing, International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 6, 2, pp. 105-123.
• Eriksson, P., Altermann, W. and Catuneanu, O. (2005) Editorial: Some general advice for writing a scientific paper, Journal of African Earth Sciences, 41, 4, pp. 285-288.
• Hengl, T. and Gould, M. (2002) Rules of thumb for writing research articles, International Institute for Geo-information science and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede, pp. 1-9.
• Kekäle, T., de Weerd-Nederhof, P., Cervai, S. and Borelli, M. (2009) The "dos and don'ts" of writing a journal article, Journal of workplace learning, 21, 1, pp. 71-80.
• Perneger, T. V. and Hudelson, P. M. (2004) Editorial - Writing a research article: advice to beginners, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 16, 3, pp. 191-192.

اعتقد من المبادئ الاساسية في كتابة المقال العلمي هو تناول مشكلة حقيقية و مؤثرة في المجتمع ، و محاولة تقديم حلول قابلة للتطبيق ، و من الممكن معالجتها ماليا و ماديا و نفسيا ، لان اساس العلم تقديم خدمات للانسان بما يسهم في تطوير حياته و مجتمعه .

Simple artical

The whole structure of the paper needs attention and the usual rule (introduction-rationale-need for the work/research gap and relative research questions-objective, background-literature review, approach-methods-hypothesis development, analysis performed-outcomes, discussion and then a separate section of fruitful conclusions/concluding remarks) could be followed more closely to facilitate the flow of the paper.

The main goal of a scientific publication is to acquaint the scientific community with the results of the author's research, as well as to indicate his priority in the chosen field of science.

A scientific article is a short, but sufficient for understanding report on the conducted research and determining its importance for the development of this field of science. It should contain enough information and links to its sources for colleagues to evaluate and verify the results of the work themselves.

The article should clearly and concisely state the current state of the issue, the goal and research methodology, the results and discussion of the data obtained. These can be the results of their own experimental research, generalization of production experience, as well as an analytical review of information in the area under consideration.

In a work devoted to experimental (practical) research, it is necessary to describe the experimental technique, evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the results obtained. It is desirable that the results of the work were presented in a visual form: in the form of tables, graphs, diagrams.

When writing an article, you should follow the rules for constructing a scientific publication and adhere to the requirements of the scientific style of speech. This ensures that the reader can clearly perceive and appreciate the data.

The main features of the scientific style are objectivity, consistency, accuracy.

In order to comply with the requirement of objectivity of scientific speech, the use of emotional statements and personal assessments in a scientific article should not be allowed.

Consistency implies a rigid semantic connection at all levels of the text: information blocks, statements, words in a sentence. The requirements for observing semantic accuracy and consistency must be adhered to when constructing a paragraph. In particular, the sentence that opens it should be thematic, that is, contain a question or a short introduction to the presentation of data. In the next sentences of the paragraph, specific information is presented - data, ideas, evidence. The paragraph ends with a generalization of what was said - a sentence that contains a conclusion. An important condition for reading comprehension is the simplicity of presentation, therefore, one sentence should contain only one thought.

The need to comply with the requirement of accuracy is manifested in the fact that terms occupy a significant place in the scientific text. The unambiguity of statements is achieved by their correct use. To do this, the author needs to follow certain rules:

use commonly used, clear and unambiguous terms;

when introducing a new, little-used term, it is imperative to explain its meaning;

do not use a concept that has two meanings without indicating in which of them it will be applied;

do not use one word in two meanings and different words in one meaning;

do not abuse foreign language terms if their equivalents exist in Russian.

At the beginning of the work on the article, you need to ask yourself the following questions.

1. What is the main purpose of the article? It should be clearly defined:

- do you describe new research results (in which case it will be an experimental article);

- do you give a new interpretation to previously published results (summary analytical article, which is used to advance and substantiate a large hypothesis);

- whether you are reviewing the literature or a major topic (it is important to show the author's, critical, attitude to the material in question, in such an article analysis and generalization are necessary).

2. What is the difference between the article and other studies on this topic, its novelty? It should be determined:

- what contribution does the publication make to science;

- how the presented results relate to other studies in this area;

- whether this material has been published earlier.

3. Where will the article be published, who is it aimed at? Before sending an article to the editorial board of the journal in which you plan to publish, it is advisable to familiarize yourself with the "Rules for Authors" in order to adhere to the requirements of the editorial board of a particular journal from the very beginning. In journals peer-reviewed by the Higher Attestation Commission, it is necessary to publish empirical material (analysis), the provisions of the final parts of the dissertation work, which present their own research, the author's developments, and not a review of literary sources on the research problem.

You need to know in advance who the article is addressed to. The author must write something new, not yet known, so that it becomes clear to the reader as much as to himself. The most difficult jobs need to be explained. If the article is a development of already known works (and not only of the author himself), there is no point in retelling them, but it is better to address the reader to the primary sources.

The next stage of work is the definition of an idea or a main hypothesis. Naturally, it has already been formed in general form; nevertheless, it is worth analyzing it again. Ideally, the article should ask one question and contain such a volume of information that allows you to comprehensively answer it. Formulate working hypotheses, think over the entire possible range of answers to the main question of the article: both those that you are going to prove and those that you intend to refute.

Regards, Pushkin Sergey Viktorovich

The whole context of writing is important, but good methodology usually leads to good results.

Valuable comments are provided. But because articles are usually written for publication. Therefore, before compiling and writing the article, it is better to select the target publication and prepare our article according to the method of that journal.

Thank you for your valuable comment Timothy Omara and Nazir A. Pala

Thank you for your valuable comment Makarim Qassim, Serdar Kalemci, and Kenneth Lui-ming Ngie

Thank you for your valuable comment Awatif Rezzoky Al-Dubaicy and Basim Freegah

Thank you for your valuable comment Pushkin Sergey Viktorovich and Ali Najafi

🌹🌹

Thank you for your valuable comment Ademar Nogueira Nascimento

تحديد العنوان وبيان الهدف وعرض المشكلة في المقدمة وضع الفرضيات ان وجدت وضع الحلول والمقترحات

Thank you for your valuable comment Alaa Ali

That the researcher adopts objectivity in everything without distinction or prejudice

It is necessary to strictly follow the requirements of the scientific journal where the scientific article will be published, and to follow the steps for the volume of the abstract, introduction, material and methods, results and discussion, conclusion, as well as references. Of course, style is very important, and the most important is the contribution of the research included in the publication. Success!

Thank you for your valuable comment Rozalina Chuturkova and Ahmed Hasan

That should be some what new...

Striking ...

Impreresive...

And at last ..

That seems...

That them would be utilized in future to crack ....

I'll share the things I follow:

1. The topic should be novel. For that you have to conduct an exhaustive literature study and find what is already published. Find out the gaps in literature and emphasize the need for your contribution. This should be clearly explained in the journal.

2. Explain your methodology clearly

3. Present the results and discussions in a scientific manner. Avoid general statements and try to include statistical validation wherever necessary.

3. Interpret your results properly.

4. Include the limitations of your study and suggest the scope for future studies

5. Write the manuscript with minimum plagiarism. I try to maintain a plagiarism of less than 5 % in Turnitin software

6. Do a thorough English grammer check. The style of writing is also important

7. I try to cite some papers from the journal I'm trying to get my work published. This might work for some journals and it is not mandatory. Even though you cite their papers the manuscript will get published only if the work is worthy enough.

All the Best!!!

It's nicely articulated talks I think, thank you so much Janani Lekshmipathy . Novelty is an important thing, indeed.

Dear Md. Abdur Razzak Choudhury ,

" Novelty is an important thing, indeed."

Just don't scare the experts :-)

Thank you so much for encouraging me dear Dr. Boris Menin . Wishes the best.

Thank you for your wonderful contribution to this thread of discussion Md. Abdur Razzak Choudhury , Boris Menin , Janani Lekshmipathy and M.K. Tripathi

You are welcome Tanvir Singh

To write a good quality scientific article you have to improve your scientific writing capability first, then you have to check plagiarism by different software. For this purpose, I think iThenticate is the best one.

Secondly, it is very important to select the journal as you have to write the article based on their criteria, otherwise the article will not be accepted for review.....

Novelty is an important things.

Thank you for your wonderful contribution to this thread of discussion Talib Abdullah Hussein and M. D.H. Prodhan

Tanvir Singh

Avoid Plagiarism and inadvertent lack of citations.

Thank you very much for your valuable comment on this thread Nirmala S.V.S.G

Tanvir Singh The most important thing to present a new scientific contribution.

Thank you very much for your valuable comment Fady M. A Hassouna

Dear Dr.Hikmat Abdulkarim Almadhkhori ,

Thanks a lot for your recommendations, it will surly inspired me.

من المهم جدا ان تكون الظاهرة البحثية لها تاصيل نظري يتوافق مع الذخيرة المعرفية التي يمتلكها الباحث بحيث تكون واضحة تماما ومفسرة الى حد بعيد

I agree with Dr wadad

Regardless of the peculiarities of each scientific discipline, the research must include problematic, hypotheses, and methodologies consistent with the problematic and capable of answering the central question. Also, it is necessary to rely on a recognized scientific theory in the specialization, then the chosen method must be applied and the results should be carefully formulated and discussed. Also, a minimum number of previous studies must be available in the theoretical part, so that we can compare our results with the previous research related to the topic. And of course a conclusion at the end

Thank you very much for your wonderful contribution M. D.H. Prodhan Dunya Mohamed Hameed Widad Gazi and Thouraya Snoussi

Avoid plagiarism and write in a similar style and also try to make it concise as much as possible and give the latest ciation

In order to write a good quality scientific articles, the following things should be considered:

1. Collect the literature's related to the present area of research for which you are interested to write an articles.

2. English language skills should be very good.

3. Check the methodology is appropriate or not following the international standard.

4. Plagiarism check is mandatory.

Thanks to all