- Branches without cortex (that would appear as lines along the axis), absence of spine cells, stipulodes or bract cells, not lime encrusted are all characters that speak for Nitella.
- The stellate chloroplasts of the simple filamentous green alga point to Zygnema.
Thank you for your replies. Any idea the exact species of these two algae? I am thinking it is Nitella pseudoflabellata, but for Zygnema, I'm uncertain.
Or by any chance any taxonomic keys you can recommend to me, especially for zygnema?
With John et al. 2011 (The Freshwater Algal Flora of the British Isles) you could address both groups (Charales & Zygnematales). With the paper attached you can try to have an idea of the species of your Nitella. However, the book deals with the UK and the paper with the Czech Republic whilst your material is from Singapore. Moreover, for the Zygnema you would need the conjugation stages and zygospores to identify the species...
I agree with answer of Marco except his recommendation of keys for Nitella. They are inappropriate for South East Asian charophytes.
It is better to use
Zaneveld 1940. The Charophyta of Malaysia and adjacent countries. Blumea 4(1): 1–223
Imahori K. 1954. Ecology, Phytogeography and Taxonomy of the Japanese Charophyta.
Pal B.P., Kundu B.C., Sundaralingam, V.S., Venkataraman G.S. 1962. Charophyta, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
Wood R.D., Imahori K. 1964. A revision of the Characeae. Second Part. Iconograph of the Characeae.
Wood R.D., Imahori K. 1965. A revision of the Characeae. First Part. Monograph of the Characeae.
Han F.S., Li Y.Y. 1994. Charophyta. In: Flora algarum sinicarum aquae dulcis, Tomus 3.
It seems to be not a Nitella pseudoflabellata because the branchlets illustrated have a distinct central secondary branchlet ray.
This plant resembles Nitella glomerata Jao et Y.Y. Li at first glance.
But to be more sure your specimens, really interesting for me, are need to be better illustrated. In particular: general habit of the plants with scale, entire fertile branchlet, end segments of branchlets, sculpture of ripe oospore surface. It is important to know if the plants produce mucilage around apical whorls.
It is important to see several plants, their sterile and fertile branchlets.
Therefore possibility of their exact identification depends on amount and quality of available specimens.
If you have many specimens it will be relly nice to see them if it is possible.
They can be easily fixed with 70% alcohol for continuous storage,
Thank you for taking time to reply. I am a student starting out in the area of Phycology and still learning the trade. Please pardon me for my ignorance. Studies on algae is lacking in Southeast Asia and I really hope that I have be of much use by focusing my research in this area.
Thank you for your recommendations for the taxonomical keys. I have Zaneveld's keys which I will be using to ID.
May I also take this opportunity to clarify which is the secondary branchlet ray that you referred to? I have seen this term several times and I am uncertain if I am looking at the right part.
Thank you so much for your help. Now I understand where are the secondary rays. >.< I will keep you updated with the progress and upload more detailed photos.