As with so many things, whether this is good or bad depends upon what you want to do.
Are you planning to run Gromacs as a major component of your research? Will you routinely be doing these calculations? It might be worth spending the money to get a better computer (and possibly a UPS backup, by the sounds of your power situation). Are you just running the occasional calculation? 1 ns/hr is quite respectable in such a case.
For reference, consider the benchmark chart at: http://www.gromacs.org/GPU_acceleration
They report about 40-50 ns/day on a 6-core i7 CPU (about twice as fast as you're getting). But they also worked on a 24k atom, cubic box system - that's a bit under half the size of your system. So you're basically benchmarking to the slowest system they put on their chart - which is still quite fast compared to what plenty of people run these simulations using.
Also note that they use a GeForce 680 in many of their benchmarks - this is a comparatively cheap card just now, as it's a few generations old, and you can find it for around $100 at some vendors. If you feel like monkeying around with graphics chip acceleration (which is sometimes harder to make work that it seems it should be), the charts suggest a well-over-2-fold improvement in calculation speed for some systems.
@Stephane Abel, I have modded a laptop with egpu 1050Ti x16 to x4 conversion. So, that's a bottleneck. i7-4702mq with 4C/8T... Later this month I am expecting to quadruple this speed as I'm developing a server (single node) myself under $2000... 10TFlops approx... And under 1kWh. Will give you the global ip and guest login so that you can test LINPACK and simulation yourself. ;)
I find post MD 'analysis' more time consuming that pushes your limits to know more and more about your system in order to come up with something meaningful.