I believe that this is one of the most important challenges for humanity in the context of the development of human civilization in the 21st century:

Should humanity strive to achieve full sustainable socio-economic pro-ecological economic development in the 21st century?

Some researchers of this problem ask the following question: Is full sustainable socio-economic ecological development in the 21st century possible?

Currently, ecological innovations are being developed in many countries, and renewable energy sources are being developed. For max. decades of traditional energy sources based on minerals will be exhausted. Agricultural arable areas are also likely to shrink. Economics will force an increase in the use of secondary raw materials and reductions in more and more expensive emissions of harmful waste. So in the new pro-ecological economy synergies of pro-ecological different activities will be realized. This synergy may perhaps generate the necessary added value. this added value may, at least partly, help to realize the beautiful ideas of sustainable socio-economic development. Will this happen now? But everything should be done to make it possible, if it ever was possible.

Even if it were to prove in the future that Sustainable socio-economic development is not possible, in the 21st century it is necessary to try to do everything to make it possible to approach it as closely as possible. However, everything possible should be done to achieve sustainable socio-economic development. In the context of this issue, the following question arises: Whether as part of taking up actions that could develop new sustainable development, or whether bottom-up social movements will inspire politicians to undertake pro-ecological initiatives in the future. At the moment, international conferences are held, during which debates on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and accelerating the processes of generating eco-innovations and implementing renewable energy sources on a larger scale. Perhaps there should be even more such discussions, perhaps the pressure from scientists should be greater for politicians, while it is not too late yet? Unless it is too late? But it probably does not make sense to accept, to think that it is too late, but you have to do what you can in the future, in part, be able to implement sustainable socio-economic development. Will humanity survive until the XXII century in comparable living conditions to those present? It is not known, but everything possible must be done to ensure that these conditions are not significantly worsened in terms of the protection of the natural environment and the progressing greenhouse effect on Earth.

In view of the above, I would like to ask you: Should humanity strive to achieve full sustainable socio-economic pro-ecological economic development in the 21st century?

I answer this question in the affirmative that YES, humanity should strive to achieve full sustainable socio-economic pro-ecological economic development in the 21st century, because less time has been spent on introducing necessary pro-ecological reforms in industry, energy, material innovations, recycling etc. is one of the most important challenges of humanity in the 21st century.

And what is your opinion on this matter?

Do you agree with me?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Best wishes

The above discussion inspired me to the following considerations: Should sustainable and pro-ecological economic development be an important determinant of shaping economic policy? Yes, in my opinion, sustainable pro-ecological economic development should be an important determinant of shaping economic policy. Do you agree with my opinion? For many centuries, the economies of countries and enterprises have developed without knowing or ignoring the principles of sustainable pro-ecological development. On the other hand, in the 21st century the realities have changed, the global warming process is accelerating and if the reforms of pro-ecological changes, development of renewable energy, recycling development, development of environmental protection etc. are not implemented, in the short term the global warming process will become an irreversible process and at the end of the 21st century the planet Earth, humanity and many other forms of life on Earth are threatened by climatic extermination due to the high rise of negative anomalies and climatic cataclysms. Sustainable pro-ecological economic development, now and in the future, can not be ignored further, it can not be considered a myth. Economics must change towards the concept of green economy. The economic policies of states should also change in such a way as to activate for the development of ecological innovations and support the processes of sustainable pro-ecological development. Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion. Best wishes

The need for striving towards full sustainable socio-economic pro-ecological economic development in the 21st century has been recognized in recent years. This requires a strong cultural development program whereby ideologies and reduced-consumption behavior as well as appropriate pro- environmental consciousness play pivotal roles in the attainment of of the targeted objectives.

Do you agree with my thesis that the 21st century should be a century of pro-ecological reforms, the age of green economy, sustainable pro-ecological development and protection of the environment and biodiversity?

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

Best wishes

In view of the above, it is also important to include in the above discussion also the following issue:

Has the classic economy lost its relevance for the energy market?

Has the classic economy lost its relevance to the energy market and therefore whether the process of necessary proecological reforms in the energy sector involving the replacement of energy sources, ie classic energy sources based on burning minerals for renewable energy sources should be coordinated by the state as a pro-environmental interventionist anti-crisis state?

Still at the end of the 21th century, in many publications written in the convention of classical economics, theses were formulated that energy should be shaped by the mechanism of market-harmonizing sides of demand and supply. However, this philosophy concerned classic energy based on the combustion of minerals. Mineral energy deposits in certain parts of the world are determined for several decades of extraction.

If the development of mining technology allows to reach and extract energy from deeper deposits than currently exploited and decks located under the sea and ocean bottoms, such estimated deposits would allow mining of these deposits in some places of the world for much longer than 100 years. However, humanity can not wait so much for pro-ecological reforms in the energy sector and the slow process of switching to renewable energy sources, which is happening in some countries, including the largest economies in the world, the largest emitters of greenhouse gases.

Currently, the philosophy of the energy sector is starting to change. Now the obvious issue is the need to quickly implement pro-ecological reforms without contemplating the depleted energy resources of the Earth's crust. This wait could take about 100 years or more than 100 years in many countries and this is too long, because at the end of the 21st century, according to climate change analysis, drastic climatic catastrophes will occur due to the predicted acceleration of the global warming process in the following decades.

According to the published and presented results of climatologists' research during the recent UN Climate Summits and Conferences on the problem of progressing global warming process, unless by 2030 at the latest the world will not show the classic energy based on the burning of minerals for renewable energy sources and motorization for electromobility and there will be no appropriate improvement of segregation waste and recycling, by the end of the 21st century, the average temperature at the Earth's surface will increase by 3-4 degrees Celsius globally, and the scale of climate cataclysms and weather anomalies will increase many times in relation to the current state.

In view of the above, the world can no longer wait for the depletion of energy minerals. This issue, which is particularly important for humanity and life on Earth, can not be left to the market mechanism and classical economy, whose philosophy has long been undermined, already in the period of the Great Depression of 1929-1934 it was demonstrated that Keynsovian state interventionism is needed to bring the economy out of the deep economic crisis if the liberalized private sector led to a crisis and the economy quickly does not return itself to balance and high economic growth on the basis of self-acting market mechanisms.

We currently have a similar situation. The world inevitably aims at increasing climatic cataclysms caused by the accelerating global warming process. these unfavorable processes for humanity and life on Earth will become a source of intensification of migration of people from subtropical areas, on which it will be impossible to live and live in a few dozen years due to high temperatures and droughts. In addition, there will be economic crises resulting from the global warming process. Humanity has no time to put off the necessary pro-ecological reforms for the future, these pro-ecological reforms in the energy sector need to be implemented now and it should be a process coordinated by the state in the context of pro-environmental anti-crisis state interference.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:

Has the classic economy lost its relevance to the energy market and therefore whether the process of necessary proecological reforms in the energy sector involving the replacement of energy sources, ie classic energy sources based on burning minerals for renewable energy sources should be coordinated by the state as a pro-environmental interventionist anti-crisis state?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

The above discussion inspired me to the following considerations:

How should the use of non-renewable natural resources be reduced so that sustainable ecological development is possible?

For many years, the consumption of clean water and minerals of energy resources and strategic industrial raw materials, such as metal ores necessary for various branches of the manufacturing industry, have been growing at a faster rate. On the other hand, the pollution of the natural environment grows, the degradation of the natural environment through mines extracting energy minerals. The amount of waste on dumps of unsorted municipal waste is growing, as well as litter that pollutes the natural environment. More and more plastic waste floats in the seas and oceans. The scale of degradation of the natural environment through the development of human civilizations is increasing.

The goal of counteracting these unfavorable processes of human civilizational activity is to carry out pro-ecological reforms in the energy sector consisting in the transformation of the classical energy based on the burning of minerals for the construction of new power plants producing renewable energy. Reforming the energy sector is necessary to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the increasingly rapid global warming process. It is necessary to develop eco-innovations thanks to which plastic in packaging will be replaced with quickly biodegradable and / or consumable materials. Waste segregation systems and electromobility should be improved. More funds from public funds of the state should be allocated for the implementation of pro-ecological reforms of reclamation of a degraded civilization environment and the implementation of nature conservation programs, natural ecosystems and biodiversity.

However, all those ecological ones necessary to carry out the reform will not ensure achieving in a global perspective fully sustainable pro-ecological development if in subsequent years the consumption of natural resources, especially water and earth's energy and other minerals indispensable for various branches of the production industry. Therefore, in order for the implementation of fully sustainable ecological development to be possible in the future, the increase in the exploitation of natural resources, especially non-renewable natural resources, should be significantly reduced.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

Therefore, I am asking you the following questions:

- How should the use of unrecognized natural resources be reduced so that sustainable ecological development is possible?

- Is it necessary to pursue a model of zero economic growth?

- Should the implementation of the zero-growth model be mainly based on reducing the consumption of natural resources?

- How should the use of non-renewable natural resources be reduced so that sustainable ecological development is possible?

- Will the protection of nature, natural ecosystems and biodiversity significantly increase by reducing the use of non-renewable natural resources?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

In my opinion, yes. It should be humanity in the 21st century to achieve fully sustainable pro-ecological economic development. Only, is it possible?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

The possibility of humanity achieving full sustainable socio-economic pro-ecological economic development in the 21st century probably depends mainly on determination to achieve this goal. The level of determination depends on the awareness of the necessity of increasing expenditures on ecological goals, economic development according to the green economy concept, developing and implementing eco-innovations for business, reforming the energy industry developing renewable energy sources, improving nature protection techniques and natural biological ecosystems etc. To increase environmental awareness it is necessary integrating ecology and the principles of sustainable development into school and university curricula, to the group of basic subjects taught in schools. In addition, the level of environmental awareness is correlated with the use of media to promote the principles of sustainable pro-ecological development, etc. The issue of promoting media principles of sustainable pro-ecological development is correlated with the involvement of various state institutions and non-governmental organizations, with finns expenditure incurred to promote the need to achieve pro-ecological goals. All these processes are correlated with the transformation of traditional economics in green economy, the development of pro-ecological businesses, the development of enterprises implementing pro-ecological innovations but not only from state subsidies but also increasingly in commercial enterprises.

Do you agree with me on the above matter?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion