The abandonment of rigorously testing the correctness of Carnot efficiency (1 - T1/T2) through Method A in favor of Method B, where theory is employed to aggregate experimental data and find a compromise between theory and experiment, signifies a pragmatic approach in contemporary scientific practice.

Method B reflects a recognition among scientists that the idealized Carnot efficiency may not fully capture the complexities of real-world systems. By relying on theoretical frameworks to analyze and integrate experimental data, scientists aim to develop a more comprehensive understanding of efficiency in thermodynamic processes.

The statement suggesting that if scientists rigorously tested the Carnot efficiency, the second law of thermodynamics would have been over long ago implies that the limitations of the Carnot efficiency model might have led to challenges or contradictions with the established principles of the second law. This perspective underscores the importance of adapting scientific methods to the evolving understanding of physical phenomena.

In essence, the shift towards Method B represents a nuanced and practical approach, acknowledging the need for a balance between theoretical predictions and empirical observations to advance our understanding of thermodynamics beyond the constraints of idealized models.

Abandoning the second law of thermodynamics is the only option. Repairing and repairing cannot solve the problem.

The starting contribution of this discussion (the graphics) is completely unclear to me. Could you provide any specific example for an occurrance of "Method B"?

https://www.doc88.com/p-503935902223.html

Well: This paper (DOI:10.1063/1.1461829, Article The IAPWS Formulation 1995 for the Thermodynamic Properties ...

All these types of articles are very complex, and the core content is Method B in my picture. This method is fraudulent and uses complex mathematics to deceive everyone.