Qualitative research involves exploring complex social phenomena through in-depth analysis of subjective data. However, researchers often bring their own biases and assumptions to the research process, which can influence data collection, analysis, and interpretation. Reflexivity is the process of examining and acknowledging these biases, in order to promote transparency, rigor, and validity in the research process.

In this discussion, let us explore the role of reflexivity in qualitative research, and how researchers can navigate their own personal biases and assumptions and will consider the below-mentioned questions.

1. How can researchers recognize their own biases and assumptions, and what are some potential strategies for promoting reflexivity in the research process?

2. What are some ethical implications of reflexivity in qualitative research, particularly in research with vulnerable populations?

3. How can researchers balance the need for reflexivity with the need for objectivity and neutrality in the research process?

4. What are some potential challenges and benefits of incorporating reflexivity into qualitative research methods?

5. How can researchers ensure that reflexivity is integrated throughout the research process, from research design to data collection, analysis, and dissemination?

I welcome a diverse range of perspectives and experiences and hope to foster a lively and productive discussion on the role of reflexivity in qualitative research.

More Banuka De Silva's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions