Physics incests billions in theory development and experiments to the problem of quantum theory-GR (general relativity) unification. Some hypotheses like holographic principle emerged born out of this issue.
The phenomenon of entanglement seems to be the most serious hope for conceptual reprochment of the theories.
But some recent results disprove work that was the only evidence of successful combination. of both theories, one of Hawkings laws.
So, should physicists Relax their adpueations for ultimate unification and "or if" thinking, i. E if such theory correct then the other which has different philosophical hypotheses must be Wrong, and addume a more soft science and Conventional, pragmatic approach of 'this theory does this work, the other this, end of story" that was the initial but not utterly satisfyibg view?
Should they disregard unification at high level and change the manifesto of physical science that Newton wrore? Should they just keep predictability and add multiple philosophical and empirical (scientific) hypotheses as accept able?
Some answers to these questions can be found in these works.
Chapter Equations of Relativistic and Quantum Mechanics (without Spin)
Chapter Spinor Fields
See the summary in:
Poster Old and New Concepts and Equations of Relativistic and Quant...
You might find an answer in my paper posted Research Gate, "Astrophysical Speculations [Up-Dated] (An Essay on Phenomena's Common Basis)".
My own biased view is that the difficulty in reconciling quantum theory and relativity is that both theories, while contributing greatly, have some serious flaws (Bohr and Einstein were too creative). I have posted a very brief paper on this on the Researchgate site, "Absurbitiies and Alternaties", and also a very extensive paper on this as well, "Astrophysical Speculations [Up-Dated] (An Essay on Phenomena's Common Basis". Even if my hypothesis proves to be wrong, I fell that some changes and something new is needed.
My own biased view is that the difficulty in reconciling quantum theory and relativity is that both theories, while contributing greatly, have some serious flaws (Bohr and Einstein were too creative). I have posted a very brief paper on this on the Researchgate site, "Absurbitiies and Alternaties", and also a very extensive paper on this as well, "Astrophysical Speculations [Up-Dated] (An Essay on Phenomena's Common Basis". Even if my hypothesis proves to be wrong, I fell that some changes and something new is needed.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Biochemistry
- Biomolecules
- Nucleic Acids
- RNA
- Small RNA
- microRNA