Please suggest to me an appropriate protocol for performing NO assay using Greiss reagent. I do not find difference in absorbance reading of control samples and test samples. What can be the possible reason?
Equal volumes of sample (tissue homogenate/Media) and Griess reagent (5% phosphoric acid containing 0.1% NEDD, 1% sulfanilamide) should be mixed and incubated in dark for 10 min at room temperature.
Then the absorbance of the reaction mixture is measured at 540 nm.
The concentration of nitrite in the sample can be determined from a sodium nitrite (NaNO2) standard curve. I like to prepare the standard curve in the same media I used for cell culture.
But maybe the problem is not the Griess assay.
1. Which macrophages are you using? My protein never induced NO production in thioglycollate elicited macrophages only in BMDM.
2. What is your positive control? The best one is LPS+IFN
I am using Raw macrophages and LPS as stimulant, which should induce more NO production with increasing time (starting from 1 h upto 12 hrs). I am using standard NaNO2 curve (100uM onwards with serial dilution upto 1.25uM). I observe that control cells (without stimulation) show same absorbance as that of treated.
I further perform bradford assay for total protein estimation and then normalize nitrite from each sample with total protein. Is this the correct way to proceed?
I've never checked total protein in the medium because of FBS. Are you using serum free media? If your medium has FBS all you'll be quantifying if the serum. I don't know for RAW cells but I believe you should extend your time periods. NO is not pre stocked inside the cells, it needs to be produced and until iNOS is expressed it takes at least 4 to 6 hours. My NO quantifications were mada always after 24 and 48 hours. Another thing, are you freezing your supernatant? Some people say it's ok but I always prefered to assay NO right away before freezing.
1. I agree with Andre that nitrite estimation post LPS stimulation is usually between 24 and 48 hours. I myself did it at earlier time points but could not detect much nitrite.
2. The problem with this time point, however, is RAW cells divide every 12 hours. So, theoretically, at 24 hours you will have half the cells at 24 hour stimulation and the other half at 12 hour stimulation. So, you will have a sort of an average readout.
3. Try using a modified version of Griess assay. Right before the actual Griess assay, consider converting nitrate into nitrite by the enzyme nitrate reductase. Sigma has a wonderful kit that works like a charm.
4. If you have access to a flow cytometer, then instead of Griess assay, you could stain for intracellular NO by using DAF-DA. That may enable you to pick up NO at earlier time points.
Sir I am not quantifying total protein in media. I am isolating protein after lysing the cells from each sample and then estimating total protein, to normalize nitrite/mg of protein in each.
I agree that iNOS expression may take time to express (upto12-24 hrs) but we may see nNOS before that time point..Is that true?
Take a look at the article I'm attaching. They use RAW cells and quantificate NO after 8, 16 and 24h after LPS exposure. Apparently they could only detect NO after 16h but 24h was better. Also, iNOS expression (western blot) was detected after 6h and 8h of stimulus.
I have optimized a protocol for the NO assay. In my case I was using 1000ng/mL of LPS and got a really good signal when I increased the time after platting before the LPS incubation and the number of cells on Raw 264.7 cells.
Hello Mansi, did you find a solution to your problem? As I am facing the exact same problem with mouse macrophages. I am stimulating with 1ug/ml LPS(E.coli 0111) but no difference between cell alone and LPS treated. I am using invitrogen Griess assay.