Hi,

For free online server to run Bayesian analyses, kindly see the links:

Kindly get the online software for your research:

http://statpages.org/javasta2.html

http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/

http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/support/downloads

http://bayes.wustl.edu/Manual/BayesManual.pdf

This is a great site!

http://www.phylo.org/

Cheers,

Dimitri

may be PhenoDB

http://phenodb.net

Another way to look at this is to find a package that is fast - so MLwin is generally noticeably quicker than Winbugs for the same problem

Have a look at this manual for the range of models that can be estimated

Browne, W.J. (2012) MCMC Estimation in MLwiN, Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.

http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/software/mlwin/download/2-26/mcmc-web.pdf

And there is a 30 day free trial.

Independent comparsions have been done - here are two  extracts from comparing software to fit a mixed effcets logit model:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/77

"The speed of the Bayesian procedures appears to depend also more on the sample size than the frequentist approaches.As a result, long processing times as in WinBUGS (14 minutes for binary and 8 hours for ordinal model, respectively) may prevent the user to do much on exploratory statistical research. The R package MCMCglmm and MLwiN (MCMC) were much faster than WinBUGS, taking only a few minutes for both binary and ordinal cases. Hence, from a computational point of view, MCMCglmm and MLwiN (MCMC) are our software of choice for multilevel modeling. In our experience, the SAS procedure MCMC was inefficient in dealing with mixed models. It was far too time consuming (37 hours for the binary model) and it did converge neither for the regression coefficients nor for the variance of the random effects. At this moment, we cannot recommend this SAS procedure for fitting logistic random effects regression models."

and

"For a Bayesian implementation, we would recommend MLwiN (MCMC) because of its efficiency"

In full disclosure mode  I should say that I work at the Bristol Centre for Multilevel Modelling that produces MLwiN but that I do not profit from sales.

I aslo realize thatthis may not help with phylogenic searches!

www.phylo.org as said by Dimitrios is the best!

5 years on and phylo.org is still the best choice to run online phylogenetics analyses including Bayesian. A bit slow though.

Dear Masoomeh Ghobad-Nejhad ,

I think it fulfills your requirement and herewith I attached a link of the online version of Mr.Bayesian phylogenetic analysis.

http://www.phylogeny.fr/index.cgi

Please note, its an online version and it can allow only thirty sequences at a time of analysis.

http://www.phylo.org/ is limited now.