In my research about this subject, I'm starting with hypothesis that audience on Internet pays more attention to multimedia elements (such as video, image, infographic, etc) than the textual content and its quality.
Is there any publication that can help me with this?
This is a great question. I believe there are articles around this area published in Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR). Search the journal's website. Prof Azer
I do not know whether any good publications out there, but this might also be a subject depending on geographic, or cultural preferences. For example, something that is funny to a certain group of people, may not be for others. So, think here "quality" is very hard to define. I guess two general definitions would be "pop culture" or "general aesthetics". Then there would be jargon-specific quality, etc...
Thank you for your opinion, I will consider that suggestions.
Anyone else?
@aparna ma'am: "should not ask for feedback "!!! really interesting criterion . .
I dont think people get attracted towards video contents..images certainly improves the content but texts nevertheless. .
For me "simplicity" is the best. Over crowded pages distracts. .so minimum and easily readable content, not an over use of colors/ animations/ video contents. I do agree to aparna ma'am, 'easy navigation and minimal depth' are also the other criteria.
Most importantly, attached media shouldn't be too heavy (keeping in mind the low bandwidth/ slow connection users)..after all, i hate pages those take ages to open and consume all my download limits. .
Regards
Priyadarsini
Thank you @Aparna and @Mishra, I appreciate your answers. Do you know any research about this phenomenon?
In addition to the points suggested by Dr Aparna and Priyadarsini
Are few more points can be taken care of.
I have looked at this issue with somewhat unexpected findings. Happy to talk more.
Article A Picture Really is Worth a Thousand Words: Public Engagemen...
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Statistics
- Survey