I think the sense of formulating hypotheses is to test existing theories and make predictions about these are, in very general and absolute terms, true or fake. The subsequent quantitative analysis is only one way by which you can do above. A quantative analysis without explicit hypotheses is only a descriptive analysis, probably without any aim....you simply describe a reality but you cannot make any inference or comment any theory...
You may consider to have some readings on epistemological issues.
I second what Fabio La Rosa states, and would add that any statement of p-value or probability implies that some null-hypothesis is being tested. In other words, if you are using any statistical tests, then hypothesis testing is implied. Presumably, it should be stated, but often it is not.
If you are interested in purely qualitative/text data, you can apply Grounded Theory. Please try with NVIVO software to gather knowledge on how to implement this.
As Fabio notes, you could limit yourself to purely descriptive work, but then the issue would be whether that makes a substantial contribution to your research field.
Hypothesis represents the important step in the scientific method of research, so it is important to formulate your hypothesis according to your question in research problem and the test of the hypothesis may give the answer to your question.
I think you have sufficient answers to your question. I will further add that sometime when we do not have sufficient previous knowledge in form of literature to base our hypothesis on, then we can also use a research question instead of hypothesis and then use inferential statistics.
Thanks a lot Muhammad Imran for your answer. I am so sorry that I am replying you very late. I actually went through your answer,but I could not respond at that time as I was in a hurry. Thanks once again.
Dear Prabha.....It’s not compulsory in all cases that you must have a hypothesis. But for the clarification of your proposed outcomes it’s better to develop one hypothesis, only in the case when you will use inferential statistics for achieving your objectives.
It is possible to do quantitative research without hypotheses. For a research objective such as "to explore and describe the intensity of Green HRM practices being applied by state corporations in Sri Lanka" you don't basically need to formulate a hypothesis and you can achieve the objective by using descriptive statistics (simply mean, standard deviation, range etc). However, if you want to formulate a hypothesis in this regard, it is possible, and that type of hypothesis is called Descriptive Hypothesis. For example, "Intensity of Green HRM practices being followed by state corporations in Sri Lanka is at good level." It is possible to use One Sample Technique to test the hypothesis.
If you use NGT (Nominal Group Technique) to identify and prioritize reasons, or aspects for/of a certain managerial phenomenon, you can use weights and percentage analysis (without using a hypothesis).
I think it is usual to have hypothesis with quantitative research, but what is more important is that before deciding on whether your study needs a hypothesis or not, you need to answer the following questions:
–Does your study take an experimental approach to answer questions?
–Are you making a prediction about the phenomenon being studied?
Mine is not to suggest an answer to the existing issue, but to ask a similar question on the research I am undertaking now. I want to know whether or not a research tilted::
INFORMATION NEEDS, RESOURCES AND SERVICES PROVISION TO KHADIS (JUDGES) IN SHARIA COURT LIBRARIES FOR EFFECTIVE DISPENSATION OF JUSTICE IN NORTH-WEST, NIGERIA.
If this is a pure descriptive study providing tables of information on needs, resources and service provisions and you do NOT plan to do any association studies then I do not need any need for any null hypothesis. You could still have research questions. You can state this as a descriptive study and hypothesis generating one. However if you plan to see if the resources or information provided has an impact on the function of Khadis etc then you need hypotheses and apply inferential statistical methods to analyse your data etc.
Once a research have research question there is no need for any hypothesis. However, exploratory or descriptive research may not necessary need hypothesis. The question for quantitative or qualitative research has no relationship with hypothesis formulation.
I also have the same question on the research I am undertaking now. My research is "Develop theoritical basis for the creation of web atlas (collection of maps) of National Parks"
Definitely no need for a hypothesis in a descriptive study. Descriptive studies are sometimes used to explore a given phenomena with the purpose of developing a hypothesis. Once we describe a phenomenon in a descriptive study (e.g. we find that a high percentage of people who eat bread seem to have cancer), we can test any developing hypothesis in an experimental study later (e.g. "Bread causes cancer" might be one hypothesis). So in short, descriptive/observational studies don't need a hypothesis. Experimental designs (e.g. RCT, CCT, Repeated measures) need a hypothesis to test.