In the ancient Chinese medicine, there were full of cure cases. However, nowadays talk about cure, it is not all of the heath care provider's business. There are many reasons:

Ancient Chinese medicine, the excellent physicians even can look at the patient's body sign, before symptoms coming out to avoid the symptom and later illness coming out. Of course, they cure diseases. However, even we can do the same, but, by law, we are not allowed to say "cure" anything even we do achieve it.

Next time, I saw them, they still do what they used to do. I remind again and again. Until their symptoms come out and get severe. Then, I tell why, they have unhappy face. But, follow some of my advice.

At sea, I got respect and ear more tips. On and, I do volunteer jobs and look for bad face. It's the best chance to cultivate and test my medical moral and tolerance.

Health is highly related to individual's moral cultivation. The moral is universal code that does not change as social value change. Nowadays values have too much upset with moral codes. The family, school and social influence have more influential power than a health care provider. Without the patient has fully adopted the moral as part of his life rule, total cure has never achieved.

Only can be temporarily achieve in some patients when they keep visiting the health care provider and the health care provider keeps reminding and holding the standard. After seeing the cure, if the patient stops the treatment. Then, the patient gradually adopted the social standard. The sickness coming back gradually.

Like one of my patients when he brought his potential wife to visit me for her life first acupuncture treatment to experience the power and helps to her who only trust western medicine. He told me that he controlled himself not dinning outside, did not eat this and that. He eventually owned good health under my treatment and watch. After getting out of my treatment, he feels the freedom to eat whatever he wants. Due to there is not one will look at his tongue and asked him that he ate something not right. He starts to enjoy his life. But, his illnesses coming back gradually.

At sea, some patients came in earlier could do more treatments. But, most of them came in too late to get enough treatments before the end of the cruise.

On land, the patient's symptoms not totally removed, some only took away 20% or 40%, they feel good enough and quit my treatment. I also learned not to tell them when to come back for the next treatment. It's due to their vicious eyes look like I want to squeeze his/her pocket. I learned to protect myself without hurting by not ask when should come back for the next treatment. Instead, I asked when do you want to come back or just waiting them call in to make the next appointment.

Do you know how funny? Even for severely sick patients, I lost my income to give them come back for treatment, I had the chances to wait and did not see the patient coming in. He/she wasted my appointment time without giving me a call for not coming! How can these kind patients get cured?

One time, I attended an acupuncturists' CE class. The  old physician instructor tod us that he does not know why so many excellent acupuncturists who know how to nourish life according to their knowledge and skills. 

An excellent Chinese medicine physician who also put their heart into care patient more than taking care of him/herself's needs. It's due to patient's sickness can not wait. Once a patient, especially a severely sick patient is coming, all of the self business, no matter how urgent it is, it is less important than saving a life.

Until now, you might know why an excellent Chinese medicine physician or acupuncturist die in his/her early age. It might be the same with the western health care providers.

 I completely agree with Frieda Mah . Her answer seems comprehensive.

Thanks. Arwa.

All of the insurance board, policy makers and grant givers' committees ought to have reasonable acupuncturists' seats to push a fair medical system be availabe.

@Frieda and Arwa, Thanks for your views and comments in the field. Chinese or Western medicines and medical doctors all are respected. The Hippocratic Oath is not anymore respected. The question remains; “human health” is that used as business?

In example, why still use toxic chemotherapy process to “treat cancer” when these therapies are not justified to treat human diseases? If, one gets to Swog site https://www.swog.org; Unicancer http://www.unicancer.fr/, etc. will realize that we are still dealing with FDA approved drugs with increased toxicity such as Fluoropyridine, Dabrafenib, Cisplatin, Taxol etc. etc.  Even Tamoxifen is toxic.

Apparently blind statistical studies are ongoing until 2020 and more using patients as control to see the «improvements” of these toxic compounds, and doctors prescribe these compounds as the only way to “treat” cancer.  Is that an absurdity?  Is that a game of money with no end?  In the Western World, chemotherapy deaths are recorded as cancer deaths, not drug deaths.

If, tomorrow a drug is invented that completely stops and treats cancer, how many companies and how many funds will oppose to get this compound commercialized. I am sure too many. This is why anti-cancer research is under control all over the globe and this research is repeating itself routinely and with no REAL success until today.  

Chemo resistant is one of additional problems that we face as society (patients, relatives, doctors, and future generations). “chemotherapy resistance" which makes the disease worse.

So, why the international health system does not change this absurdity and not try to treat these diseases, considering Human as an ethical entity with rights and hope.  The human being is not a test tube for the market. The human being has the right to get knowledge, control of funds that are used all over the planet to repeat experiments with no hope for the patient but only for the market.

We can use many many scientific concrete data to defend this failure of cancer therapies until today. I think it is time to revisit human rights and human hope. 

@Vassilis, You are right. Beneficial sides are mutual cover each other to mislead people. That's why there are so many different kind revolution stories exist in the world history. Science is the best decoration and it can be manipulated by sampling and the trail design to induce the money making result. Otherwise, modify the result data.

Between honest with the general public's health or feeding family members, many scientists' choice to bend their trunk to hold their job.

I completely agree with Frieda Mah, she has an excellent idea about such topics.

Emad

The Cancer Industry is Too Prosperous to Allow a Cure

August 8, 2017

As presented in : http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/the-cancer-industry-is-too-prosperous-to-allow-a-cure/

and many related scientific papers;

"Cancer Makes Too Much Money to Cure

We have lost the war on cancer. At the beginning of the last century, one person in twenty would get cancer. In the 1940s it was one out of every sixteen people. In the 1970s it was one person out of ten. Today one person out of three gets cancer in the course of their life.

The cancer industry is probably the most prosperous business in the United States. In 2014, there was an estimated 1,665,540 new cancer cases diagnosed and 585,720 cancer deaths in the US. $6 billion of tax-payer funds are cycled through various federal agencies for cancer research, such as the National Cancer Institute (NCI). The NCI states that the medical costs of cancer care are $125 billion, with a projected 39 percent increase to $173 billion by 2020. 

The simple fact is that the cancer industry employs too many people and produces too much income to allow a cure to be found. All of the current research on cancer drugs is based on the premise that the cancer market will grow, not shrink."

Follow the ancient Chinese medicine will not lose the war!

Big ((Yes) Human health has become an important area of profit-making between life insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies, some companies have even followed the approach of companies that manufacture the virus and at the same time sell the antivirus and  you have a lot of examples Including SARS, Ebola and many others, The health of human beings has become a leading trade for profit making.

Does anyone have the strategies to fix Dr. Salam Jassim Hmood mentioned · problems if they are true?

@Frieda @Salam, Science cannot progress on speculations. There are clear improvements in human health but still exist important questions to address for the wellbeing of humanity.  We can treat cancer. I can refer as an example to atRA and arsenic treatments for Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL) and, these treatments happen to get a Chinese origin.  Therefore, cancer can be efficiently treated preserving human health.  However, for any progress and for any kind of scientific question and concern, we need as scientists to establish concrete data and only under these circumstances; we can address a scientifically concrete question. Speculations is the worst enemy of any scientific progress.

Dear Vassilis,

We all know that the pharmaceutical is a vast industry.  Most industry, such as all agro-industry, originated in some human needs.  The residential construction industry originate in the human need for shelter.  But capitalism in all form of industry is about increasing capital/profit and this is even more important than what the industry is supposed to do: caring for human needs.   The industry always develop in the direction that maximize profits (the need of the owners) and often this conflict with supplying the needs this whole industry is supposed to do.  IN the case of the pharmaceutical industry,the research is concentrated only on the drugs or vaccins that would be profitable.  Drugs that cure are not as lucrative than drug that are taken for a life long condition.  Drugs that would increase the quality of life of minute rich elite are more lucrative than drug that would make a vast majority of poor to cure fatal desease.  Drug that would prolong life by ten years for a minute rich minority could be more profitable for a drug that provide 1000 more life for pennyless people.  So for the industry, needs of those without money are worthless and are not considered systematically.   Into a world where there would be no poverty and wealth be distributed then market would work better in aligning the needs and profits.  But capitalism is intrinsically concentrating wealth and thus increasingly de-allign needs for the vast majority and profits for the minute minority.

@Louis, Could be possible to imagine that human health gets a profit from capitalism? Capitalism grows on repeating and providing services to the infinity while expressing a fake humanitarian face exploring human hope of any kind, including beverages as coca cola or chemotherapy drugs.

The fundraising for HIV, cancer and so many rare or less rare diseases suggests that human is very vulnerable when suffers.  Even the church gets a lot of funds and money when the only human hope before the human loss is God and the spirit. 

Human civilization imposes that we need to find ways to limit human control from the uncertainty produced by the human loss, the death and the diseases.  From my point of view, this is the main and unique reason to do Sciences, be a scientist; Science should serve human so to become free.

Anticancer research and fundraising the last 20 years is apparently a big failure. We can observe a big failure for the big pharma in anticancer strategies as too many drugs are forced to stop at phase 2 or 3.  Many companies switched their R&D program to investor program. The big pharma, the startup companies, the funding system, all the medical and biotechnology system are under permanent questioning.

When a fund wants to multiply its benefits by 10-50% in 3years, from an innovative project on cancer, then there is one hundred percent certainty that this project will failure.  These scientists start to follow the instructions of managers. We can provide many published related data where the initial scientific model was wrong but it took more than 10 years to accept that publicly!, Meantime, anticancer funds invest, donors invest hopes and money, the administrators wrote libelous on anticancer progress. The investors should be confident, the scientists switched to administrators and now want an additional XXmillions$ to continue the initial project for additional 5 years and at the end the only real looser is the human health.

So, big pharma switch to big investors as they continue to accumulate funds because the investors observe that the cancer sales, the service on cancer sales, the service on cancer and diseases and the current research on cancer drugs will continue to grow on the premise that the cancer market will grow because human hope is endless.  Statistics gives to a patient 2 years or 5 years of life, so an additional statically year gives big money to investors.

This is the real failure in anticancer research.

The failure in anticancer therapies is not only a problem of capital; capital plays a catalytic role, this failure is mainly a problem of wrong scientific models and wrong people that control sciences all over the globe.  The majority of the current research programs on cancer and many related diseases are built on wrong research models established some years ago and wrong initial hypothesis.  This is a reality confirmed by the fact that big companies stop multimillions dollars projects after many failures to advance initial research models from phase 2 to 3 to 4 etc.

Therefore, failure in human health and anticancer research switch scientists to investors and then Science becomes a question of capital and, capital cares only for the capital.

The best solution is to avoid sick. That's what I teach people to do. Before sick, health is controlled by each individual. Once sick and sick more severely, one's health is directly or indirectly controlled by profit makers.

@Frieda, This is great, avoid to be sick. I completely agree.

Bellow is a short history of Chemotherapy origin during 2ww. Do not forget that wars influence our life and, today's antcancer therapies are still driven by funding trust using same philosophical conception, "when a business works we keep it going".

"The discovery of penicillin and its successful production and distribution during World War II ushered in the modern age of antibiotics. The success of these new drugs convinced many that diseases could be eradicated chemically. The discovery of additional antibiotic drugs such as erythromycin and tetracycline changed mortality patterns drastically: By the 1950s deaths from infectious diseases, especially pneumonia, began to decline and heart disease and cancer became major killers. Interest in cancer research, especially chemotherapy, intensified with the increase in cancer deaths."

"The history of chemotherapy is rooted in research in gas warfare conducted by the United States and Britain during World War II (and in germany- my comment). That experience convinced some "researchers" that chemical agents could be used to destroy or control the growth of cancer cells, the core definition of chemotherapy.

After the war, experiments were conducted using nitrogen mustards to fight leukemia. Much of this work was done at the Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research in New York City where many of the scientists who had worked in the Chemical Warfare Service during wartime relocated in peacetime."

"Nitrogen mustards" cannot treat human diseases. The "Chemical Warfare Service" cannot treat Cancer. This is my opinion. The philosophy of Chemical Warfare Service still drives  Anti--cancer Therapies and this controls progress in Sciences.

I agree with Dr.Frieda

Do not need to use drugs to prevent cancer. All cancer patients have cold body, insomnia. When just has insomnia, even use cosmic self-healing can help. Cold body? Stop intake cold foods and drinks. Eat salad, put raw ginger in. Drink raw or dry fried ginger tea in the summer and cinnamon tea in the winter can warm up the body. That's easier to prevent cancer and many other diseases developed. I do not know why things go out of Chinese culture become so complicated.

As Laozi's famous quote: "The biggest way is the simplest way!" Please read below link to understand Laozi.

In Chinese medicine, the ancient time, the prevention is done when there is an early body sign came out, but before any symptom coming out, we start to treat.

Like I was used to needle CV 17 and let my patient try breathing. They always replied that "I can breathe easier and deeper. Why I do not know that? I think I can breath normally." I used to replied "You are day to day deviated health without your notice. But, your body sign shows me your Lungs capacity is deviated. That's why I put a needle in there to let you notice your health issue and your body has an early sign to warn you."

Meanwhile, I noticed that when Chinese historical records be translated into English, the dates have highly possible changed to be a later date. In the Chinese record, it's a century earlier for Laozi's time in English.  

https://universaltcm.com/cold-foods-drinks-caused-problems-chart-rev-1/

https://universaltcm.com/cold-foods-and-cold-drinks-caused-health-problems/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laozi

@Frieda, Thanks for your comments and inputs on diseases' control from the Chinese view. In fact old civilizations as the Chinese one could provide excellent ideas and remedies on cancer definition and cure. Unfortunately, the western driven human progress is not open-minded to accept errors and wrong models used the last 30-40 years with no real success in cancer therapies.  There are many examples we can provide. Even the progress in cancer therapies in countries as Cuba, should be taken in consideration when deal with human lives.

From my point of view, the subject "Cancer" needs a restart at the philosophical and scientific point of view. If, we ask how it works the coordination of a simple 2-signal active cell system, no one can reply with certitude.

No one can reply if we ask where and which are the borders of a cell?? No one can reply what is the real reason of a metastasis; a cancer cell, a nuclear body, an exosome, a circulating ex-chromosome genetic information…

The clear answer to cancer therapies today cannot be the toxic blind uncivilized chemotherapies and radiation, two blind processes that refer to middles Ages.  

The Cancer field needs a new restart with transparency, a primary emphasis to human cure and not to capitals.  

Obviously, economic studies show that it is economically more prudent to view health-care as a right. We'd save about $350 billion dollars a year if the USA had a single-payer health-care system, rather than a profit-driven (commercial) disease-care system.

All that extra money would be put to health care, rather profit-driven disease-care and millions of dollar bonuses for CEO's that would be better put into true research that works on documenting cancer cures. Further, cancer would be "cured," as it has been cured long ago, were it not for the profitable "non-profit" cancer "research" organizations that guide "cancer research" in the USA.

Cedars, Sloan Kettering, and other such organizations, would lose billions if cancer and other terminal diseases were known to be curable. It is not in their best "interests." http://www.encognitive.com/node/10755

Its a business. People have patents and companies have rights. Its purely business Why poor people die in spite of fact that medicines are available in shops. Natural or old medicines for human health may be somewhat helpful and  natural herbs need preservation.

Without income, the researchers will die and no new invention any more. But pure business to invest high like the current western medicine do, it brings high tech and become rich people's right for health care. If it's from private money. It's fine. But, it's from public donation or tax money, I do not feel it's right. Going to the high cost is pure a business protection to kick out hot competition.

Meanwhile, I am from ancient Chinese medicine. If my attention is to find the cheapest way to treat and benefit the general public, especially for the financial disadvantage or lack of medical facilities are a person or in the war, disaster area, there is shortage medical services or at the moment, it's impossible to get the services such as the rescue team in the military. God also blessed me to find a solution. Though, I also invested a lot that is impossible for the majority people to do so. However, compared to the western medicine, it's a piece of cake!

Different mindset induced different result. This world is an illusion. Either way can get wanted result. But, the impact and final live saving have a different outcome. Plus, time screen is the best yardstick. That's why ancient Chinese medicine still is the best medical science and the most complete medical system in the world. That it can stand alone well. However, if add nowadays high tech can make it save more such as the fine needle to replace the original thick needle to reduce patient's pain and injury, needle knife to replace regular surgery that is a cheap approach for not deep surgery,

Now that we know what cancer is, and, importantly, few know how to treat cancer growth and metastasis - we are getting in the period of personalized cancer medicine.

New infrastructures, investments, thousands of RT-PCRs, data selection, the future is bright. The blind tests on patients run until 2020-2022, companies and related investors should be certain that money is a success.

http://www.cancer.net/navigating-cancer-care/how-cancer-treated/personalized-and-targeted-therapies/what-personalized-cancer-medicine

What Is Personalized Cancer Medicine?

Approved by the Cancer.Net Editorial Board, 05/2017

"Personalized medicine helps doctors learn about a person’s genetic makeup and how their tumor grows. With this information, doctors hope to find prevention, screening, and treatment strategies that may be more effective. They also want to find treatments that cause fewer side effects than the standard options. By performing genetic tests on the cancer cells and on normal cells, doctors may be able to customize treatment to each patient’s needs.

Creating a personalized cancer screening and treatment plan involves:

1) Finding out the chances of a person developing cancer and selecting screening strategies to lower the risk

2) Matching patients with treatments that are likely to be more effective and cause fewer side effects

3) Predicting the risk of recurrence, which is the return of cancer”

Nice to hear from the specialists some real concrete success data on personalized cancer therapies and, how scientists validate these personalized treatment plans. Any success ?

From what I understand and I read from the official cancer net: “With this information, doctors hope to find prevention, screening, and treatment strategies”.

As the conception of Hope has no real value in Sciences, I understand that the all story of Personalized Cancer Medicine is still at the observation level without a REAL model explaining cancer development and prevention.

From what I know no one experiment works without a scientific hypothesis, a working experimental model and a validation.

Glad to learn that western medicine starts to pay attention to personalized medicine as Chinese Medicine used to do.

However, according to my experience, cancer does not to be genetic. Such as female hormone be added to dairy products, male or female can get breast cancer without any cancer history in the family. After treated, once, he/she and family members quit dairy products, there is no worry about the breast cancer.

Cancer patients have 3 common characters: Cold body, acidic blood and negative mindset/attitude/unhappy. Those three can be the same diet or attitude toward to daily life. That can be changed easily. Once labeled as genetic, it becomes hopeless for the patient and loses confidence for self-health controlling.

Now, it really creates an easy money making business to let the patient like a cow that get a ring from his MD through its nose and be pulled by MD's string without any choice.

Having documented cures for 15 "medically impossible" things so far, I know what profit-driven American "disease-care" medicine does to suppress the knowledge of cures. Eventually, when truly conservative people realize that we will save/conserve $350 billion dollars a year by going to a single-payer health-care system, the USA will join the rest of industrialized nations in converting to a compassionate health-care system that embraces 5,000 years of Chinese medicine, as well as medicines that indigenous peoples around the world employ to harmonize their bodies using natural cures. Not that there isn't a place for Western medicine. There is. It's just much less than it is promoted to be by profit-hungry medical rogues. The notion that we can't convert to single-payer because we will pay more taxes, is more than offset by the savings that we will get in reduced medical costs. I'll pay more in taxes to have the government run a health-care system that improves the health of the people in a way that creates a net savings by having lower health-care costs that greatly outweigh the increase in taxes.

Yes The whole world fortunate is destroyed by the money driving health care system. How many medical tragedies created? How much money wasted in medical research and healthcare that scarified education, beneficial community development, drugs induced environmental pollution future caused all creatures suffering, drugs change people's personalities that caused more relationship tensions and conflicts, etc.

Please read: http://happypinmasterhealer.com/why-have-patients-abnormal-emotions-2/

In Chinese medicine, health is easy to reach: keep qi and blood flow smoothly and harmonized, have positive mindset/attitude. So, there are so many folk medicine works, sing/dancing, writing can help health as well as many other healthy social activities such as volunteer to help the others.

Not as the US western medicine from a discomfort becomes severely sick and absorb community resources to serve a bright future person to become a severely sick patient lying on the bed to keep so many people busy and worry.

It's like heaven vs hell. Everyone has self-healing power and it is easy to be activated. The kindest person and kids usually do not need to activate it. They keep it with it without lost.

Please watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5c0c5I1wdg.

It's not only the cancer itself is a big mess in the world. As I joined many coaches' live event. I learned the big health pie has too many non-medical professionals to join and misleading the general public.

Health field has been treated as a business to make a living and make quick and easy money instead of saving lives. For example, the supplements (not the Chinese herbs) that http://happypinmasterhealer.com/why-real-tcm-physicians-refuse-using-supplements-to-treat-patients/

One day, I met a guy who only uses a single science report that talked about magnet benefits health. So, he teaches his clients do not sleep on the bed, sleep on the floor that is closest to the earth center the magnet field. His client base is growing. I taught him that the level below 3 feet above the ground in Chinese is yin. That the cold air sinking and the coldness of the ground can penetrate into the body. It's not good for health.

There are many other funny things. I cannot list all of them. But, I can see people's helpless in maintaining health. So, if there is any one talks about something new and good at talking, the helpless people like the person sinking in the water, they grasp anything the they can catch tightly. This is the best to describe the health business: It's a mess.

On the other hand, people are easy to be cheated and fool instead of paying good to look for a real health professional.

Bribery in Science is the major problem in the 21st.

1) https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/22/world/europe/greece-bribery-novartis-investigation.html

How to built a market and the prices for drugs that do not function:

Greece Approves Bribery Investigation Involving Political Elite

2) En Grèce, plusieurs anciens ministres cités dans une affaire de corruption En savoir plus sur http://www.lemonde.fr/europe/article/2018/02/09/en-grece-plusieurs-anciens-ministres-cites-dans-une-affaire-de-corruption_5254370_3214.html#IeyMOvfGIdvJps3f.99

3) Grèce : 4200 médecins accusés d'avoir favorisé le laboratoire Novartis

http://www.lefigaro.fr/societes/2018/02/18/20005-20180218ARTFIG00149-le-scandale-de-corruption-novartis-secoue-la-grece.php

PS. Similar situtation is in all countries

My concern is the mental health sector, the use of drugs the effects of which are not confirmed by independent research. Any information on this?

Something that is a "right" can be provided by businesses. You have a "right" to a speedy trial, for example, but that does not mean that the law profession is not built on businesses that practice law.

I don't know whether the idea that the medical profession prefers to sell drugs, as opposed to cure diseases, is just overly cynical rhetoric from those who have an axe to grind, or whether it's true. I'm hoping it's just overly cynical rhetoric. Clearly, over the decades, medicine has found cures and found vaccines, both of which go way beyond any notion that the medical industry only want to sell more pills.

But, medicine is not my field, and I try my best to stay as far from pills and practitioners as I safely can. If I have to visit a doctor, I would way prefer to be told "it will go away by itself" than to be given pills to swallow. Please!

Human Health is a balanced organism by:

1. 'Ecology'

2. 'DNA'

3. 'Psychology'

4. 'Health & Family welfare' of 'Nation'

5. 'Self Care'

All 'Five' upto extent organise 'Health'

It should be a right as consideration for our fellows. However, in the US greed rules medicine

Although it's our right as human being. In many cases, it's business, specially in developing countries.

Everything is now going to professionalize. We must rethink about humanity. Health is one type human service to help someone in problems.

Human right must be the first to think of.

The first IS human right

Thanks for all of your valuable input: Health is human's right! You are absolutely right!

If under western medical care, there are more organ failures, tube insertions than pure Chinese medicine treatments. Can we say Chinese medicine care is more humane?

If health is a human right, why there is no one challenge the health insurance pay less totally for alternative medicine like acupuncture than the western medicine?

If health is a human right, why researchers and insurance companies do not study and compare the result vs total cost for Chinese medicine and western medicine or the total reimbursement for Chinese medicine vs western medicine?

If health is a human's right, why researchers only study western medicine without looking into Chinese medicine and put efforts to learn??

Health is very practical. It's not a theory only. It directly relates to a life. The quality of the patient's life quality, out of pocket money and final stage of life journey should be emphasized. However, what is the current situation?

Medical cost goes sky high. Recover period is too long. Most chronic diseases are life long and ended tubes inserted and organ failures. Many no clue diseases were well treated and documented in ancient Chinese medicine 2~3 thousand years ago. Is it right?

Dear @Albert Manfredi

Thanks for your reply. You are smart to look for a no drug treatment. Chemical drug is not the only solution for health maintenance.

Frieda

The WHO Constitution (1946) envisages …the highest attainable standard of health as a fundamental right of every human being.

Understanding health as a human right creates a legal obligation on states to ensure access to timely, acceptable, and affordable health care of appropriate quality as well as to providing for the underlying determinants of health, such as safe and potable water, sanitation, food, housing, health-related information and education, and gender equality.

Health should be kept out of bound for capitalism. It is simply immoral to not provide drugs and health care for those in need.

It's a human right, not a business.

Cher Louis,

Health should be kept out of bound for capitalism. It is simply immoral to not provide drugs and health care for those in need.

But at the same time, health care providers, those developing the medicines, drugs, call them whatever you like, and the facilities where health care is given, have to have resources too. If these resources are not provided by the usual business models, meaning supply, demand, and competition among participant health care industries, then the only alternative is to provide the resources through taxation. Are there any other alternatives?

If provided through taxation, you are putting bureaucrats in charge of apportioning the wealth, generously offered by the taxpayers, to the needs. And the result of this is as expected. Longer delays for service (sometimes egregiously long delays), shortages or wasted oversupply, frequently overburdened facilities, although yes, lower costs to patients.

There are no trivial answers here. Just saying "capitalism," to denote something bad, is way too simplistic, IMO. You need to describe the alternatives, pluses and minuses. Some countries offer a mix of private and public providers.

It is a human rights and at the same time it is businesses because they represent an important need of people

Dear Fateh Boutekkout,

After long term health development and financial power of higher educated people, health almost is the number one concern nowadays. Health field becomes the biggest pie in commercial.

Therefore, many none health professionals jump into this field after the long term financial going down to produce more misleading in the medical field.

Such as I attended a speaking event, I met a guy who lost his job and he read an article that stated magnet is benefit of people's health. So, he became a "coach" to teach "health". He promotes his followers to sleep on the floor instead on a bed. The reason is closer to the earth and get stronger magnetic field influence to health.

In Chinese medicine, sleep on the floor less than 3 feet is yin (cold) field that hurt the people's health when whose yang Qi is weak.

Of course, I also see more funny things. It's a mess in the health field now. There is full of misleading.

Frieda

If can break the rule like China, natural herbal formula can also apply for pattern. Then, nowadays health problems gone. The chemicals, keeping damage body organs, make more and more severe blockage inside the body. It causes the tubes inserted and organs failure.

Our body does not like chemicals, even years ago, proved that

Yes. It sounds good to provide drugs. But, the food's chemical damage our body is still milder than the drugs. The food's chemical damages are already showing partially above.

Is there any one compare the same illness to use herbs and to use drugs, which one is better?

Please read the attachment.

As the last hope of the patient, I also treated many mistreated patients and severely sick patients after decades drugs treatments. The most important thing to reverse patient's situation is to expel the drugs accumulated toxins in the patient's body. Then, the situation can be reversed. However, for strong drugs or treatment center intended to hold the patient by illegal action, my efforts always be washed out after the patient's next visit his/her MD.

This is more obvious can see in the severely sick patients. Due to by law, we cannot stop a patient's life dangerous treatment or drugs. I only can treat patients with tears and a bleeding heart. Meanwhile, I treat these kind patients without paying or only paid very little. In long term financial loss, I closed my clinic.

My case is better to say if not, treat health as a business, the result is the professional life will die sooner than people think especially I am not practicing in a rich area. Patients hold "free western treatments firmly!"

However, if I practice in a rich area, I bet that I will be rich!

However, due to I treated financial disadvantage people, I changed my journey to be a no drugs even no acupuncture treatment's preventive health care. It will be the future trend in lower health care to a minimum cost to save all countries' health care system. meanwhile return health maintenance to be everyone's responsibility to avoid misuse the health care system.

The correct knowledge will be widely spread instead of money making misleads.

The real health is simple, easy and economic. I will write a series books to teach.

I also discover the difference of practice in a rich area and in a financially disadvantaged area:

Rich area's people like I worked on the cruise ships, the majority of my patients followed my instructions and take health as their own responsibility. Their attitude toward life is more positive. They study and keep good knowledge. Their body, mind, soul frequency is higher in general. They cheered me always with their happiness and/or wisdom or broad knowledge. It's happy to treat them.

The financial disadvantage area, especially for the severely sick patients, they asked for a discount or no pay. But, the majority of them ignored my instructions, but abused their body and threw them health responsibility to me. The majority of them have bias, or do not study, or study wrong materials. or keep negative thinking, attitude to dump garbage repeated to me or very self-centered. I need to cheer them up.

I always think that if these severely sick patients can collaborate with me and change their concept and life attitude, my effort would not be washed out again and again. It was a nightmare for me in my life.