Why should it matter who the reviewers are? The content of the reviews is what matters, not who writes them.

Hello Yamina Soula , your question can be interpreted in multiple ways. Do you want to list the reviewer of your manuscript in the acknowledgment section? If yes, all you can do is generalize the reviewer(s) because you can't know the review due to the journal mode of reviewing manuscripts.

However, if you just want to know the reviewers this journal uses, you can't. Most journals only list their editors. The link to the above journal editor is below.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/communications-in-nonlinear-science-and-numerical-simulation/about/editorial-board

Lastly, as Stam Nicolis has rightly said, the content of the review is what really matters.

If you have found the reviewers comments to be helpful then it is considered good manners to add a sentence to your acknowledgements section, something like,

"The authors thank the two anonymous reviewers for their comments which greatly improved our article."

or

"The authors thank the first anonymous reviewer for their suggestions which greatly improved section 2 of our article."

Try to keep it short and not overly praising of the reviewers which might be viewed as sycophancy (if that is possible with an anonymous referee).

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/editors/how-to-find-reviewers/32890&ved=2ahUKEwiV4_6X7KLvAhXjxzgGHRlVBLQQFjAAegQIARAC&usg=AOvVaw0lbLQLMucIjGbThu0jr6B8&cshid=1615280364407

Most journals do not show the names of reviewers of a particular paper. Only very few journals disclosed the reviewers name on the final publication should this endorse publication. This is an agreement between journal and reviewers. Otherwise, the names are shown on an annual basis or the reviewers can get some honorary acknowledgement for their work via Publons if they decide so. You should not interfere with these agreements. Of course, you may thank your reviewers anonymously.

A limited number of journals published the reviewer's name on the final publication while many of them don't show the name of the reviewer for an article. It is an agreement between the journal and reviewers. Contrarily, the names are shown on an annual basis.

Dear Yamina Soula and Marc R Roussel in our field of research, virtually all renowned journals ask for ca. 3-5 suggested reviewers during the online submission process. Ideally these should not come from the same institution or have been co-authors of previous publications. Many journals also offer the possibility to oppose certain reviewers, e.g,. colleagues who are direct competitors in the same area of research.