I am calibrating hydrological models in order to investigate climate change impacts on flow exceedance. I am getting good NSE/KGE scores of 0.9+ for calibrating my various models on observed data. I have 4/5 regional climate models that have future scenario meteorology and historical period meteorology. When analysing the historical datasets with the observed flow for the same time period, the NSE/KGE score is around 0.4/0.5. In order to achieve bias corrected results i assume you run the future scenarios with the optimised parameters from the historical data sets? even though the optimisation scores are lower?

More Cian O'Sullivan's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions