Hello,

I'm an undergrad and I'm trying to figure out how to deal with qPCR data.

I'm currently working on this :

I have 7 experimental conditions (DMSO for control, 3 concentrations of a drug A, and 3 concentrations of a drug B), in which I treat human cells.

For each treatment, I did like this : I took 3 wells of cells from the same thawing, then I treated each well with the same treatment.

Then I lysed all cells and instead of pooling each lysat together like I usually do, I made one well = one Eppendorf tube. So I ended up with 3*7=21 eppendorf tubes, which I annoted DMSO_1, DMSO_2, DMSO_3 for DMSO samples well 1, well 2 and well 3, etc.

Then, I extracted the RNA from each sample, one third at a time (every "well 1" samples together, etc.), not for any particular reason, I just didn't feel comfortable extracting the RNA from all my samples at once.

Then I made my RT one third at a time again, and then my qPCRs, using 2 different reference genes (one for drug A, one for drug B).

So from start to finish, all my "Well X" samples are grouped together and separated from my other "thirds" of wells.

At first I thought I would just end up pooling all the relative expressions for each genes and each samples. But then my supervisor pointed out that my DMSO samples may have been different from one another, and that maybe putting DMSO1 with DRUGA_1 wasn't the right thing to do; and therefore I needed to find out how to analyze all the data from separate RT.

But I honestly don't know how to deal with that. The easiest solution would be to perform RT-PCR all over again, by doing the RT for all my samples at once, and then put everything on a same qPCR plate, but I would like to avoid doing that to save some money. Instead, I would like to know if there is some way to use all the raw data obtained for all my different RT-qPCRs.

Would making the average of all my raw expression data from each condition then normalizing on the averaged DMSOs work? (Using the deltaCT method)

I hope this isn't too confusing (or cringy to read, because maybe not doing that in the first place would be obvious to you).

Regards

More Alexandre Ld's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions