Dear Anjy Rw unfortunately due to the corona pandemic this is not a good time for scientific conferences, at least not for face-to-face ones. In any case the conferences should perfectly match your research interests and should ideally give you the chance to meet some of the famous researchers in your discipline. Titles of conferences are normally not misleading, and in their announcements / flyers they normally provide a good description of the scope and topics. I you still have some doubts you could ask a senior colleague at your institution.As indicated by Andrew Paul McKenzie Pegman and Dean Whitehead I would also strongly suggest to present only published work or work that has just been accepted for publication or is in press.

Regarding conferences calls, there are a few services which I will recommend to check:

https://www.cfplist.com/

http://www.wikicfp.com/cfp/

https://call4paper.com/

https://conferencealerts.com/

https://euagenda.eu/

http://www.allconferences.com/

I wish You all the best in the New Year. Happy 2021!

Conferences do not promise anything with regard to publication. It is risky to expose your research at conferences since data can be stolen and people will just be critical. You don't transform conference papers into journal articles; you write them as journal articles from the outset, keeping all information confidential until final publication :)

Wise words indeed from Andrew. Definitely attend conferences on the basis of an established manuscript as 'this is in review/this is in press'. There was a more innocent time 5-years or so ago, where you could present preliminary/tentative findings at conferences, without too much fear of 'academic theft' - but that 'space' is far less secure now with predatory authors and journals looking for opportunities.

Dear Anjy Rw unfortunately due to the corona pandemic this is not a good time for scientific conferences, at least not for face-to-face ones. In any case the conferences should perfectly match your research interests and should ideally give you the chance to meet some of the famous researchers in your discipline. Titles of conferences are normally not misleading, and in their announcements / flyers they normally provide a good description of the scope and topics. I you still have some doubts you could ask a senior colleague at your institution.As indicated by Andrew Paul McKenzie Pegman and Dean Whitehead I would also strongly suggest to present only published work or work that has just been accepted for publication or is in press.

The answer to the part of your question about transforming your conference presentation into a journal article is that the journal article needs something different from the conference presentation. This may be additional data sources, more extensive data analysis, or a new dimension in your Discussion section.

1. Scope of the conference need to match with the research interests of author

2. Conference proceedings to be published by well known publishers like IEEE, Springer, Elsevier etc.

3. Chance of meeting people (at least virtually) with similar research interests that can potentially trigger collaborations

4. Using the central theme of the conference paper intact, extended analysis, findings, comparative studies etc. may be needed for journal publication

Hi

I think if we have to submit any Research to the conference .. There is always THEME AREAS, keeping theme into consideration we submit our Research.. If we have submitted our Research there in terms of .... Conference Paper... Then no replica can be published in another journal article

You get your credit by publishing your Research in that conference in terms of conference paper which they are publishing in their own journal....

Dear Anjy Rw ideally the organizers of the conference make an arrangement with a peer-reviewed international journal to publish a Special Issue with contributions from the conference. Unfortunately, this is not often the case. In such Special Issues the conference lectures are published as regular full papers and undergo the normal peer-review process. We did this 10 years ago when I organized a symposium at the Pacifichem chemical conference. The lectures given at this symposium were simultaneously published as regular research papers in a Special Issue of the renowned Journal of Organometallic Chemistry:

Article Foreword to the special issue on the Pacifichem 2010 symposi...

Thank you Anjy Rw for your question. Most academics or clinicians have one or two conferences they must attend yearly. These conferences are related to their work and help them to keep their knowledge up-to-date and share their research work with colleagues. Usually, these conferences are organised by societies or associations they are member or fellows for many years.

Also, Anjy Rw not all papers presented at conferences, end into a full papers. We are currently researching this area.

Also, Anjy Rw Select a conference on these bases: 1) the theme and organisers are related to your primary work, 2) conferences organised by major societies or associations usually provide more learning opportunities 3) opportunities to present your work at the conference. 4) standards and quality of key-note speakers etc.

The smaller the scale, the better, I should say. If the context of the conference, or a part of it, is based on your research focus, you get good feedback:) Moreover, better check whether there are any plans for publications or collective work following the event so that the time you spend on the paper and networking are worthwhile for your future work.

Dear Anjy Rw it seems to me that 2021 is again not a good year for face-to-face conferences. Please see e.g. the following useful link entitled "Covid Vaccines Bring Hope, But Not New Meetings"

https://www.northstarmeetingsgroup.com/News/Industry/Weekly-Survey-Tracking-Coronavirus-Meetings-Response