Utilizing, earth magnetic field, earth gravitational force, solar, wind etc sources, for free energy, it is possible. But it cannot be considered against the law of conservation of energy, it is transfer of energy. All natural elements supplying free energy to human being should be considered as God, sun the main , and should be prayed 🙏and is the SANATAN Hindu philosophy 🕉🙏

It depends on what you mean by 'Free Energy'. Solar energy is free; wind energy is free; tidal energy is free. However, the proponents of Free Energy seem to mean a method of extracting energy from the vacuum. There is no viable scientific process known to do this; but that does not mean to say one cannot exist, It just means we need to know an awful lot more about physics than we do to make it work!

Dear Tony Maine

What I mean of free energy is there is no input energy (or for the first time only) to produce energy continually, as seen on Youtube...

Thanks Bhupendra Desai

The free energy means that there are energy output without input in some special sysyem. This is perpetual motion machine of first kind or second kind. If shown by You Tube is true, it will imply a new energy theory revolution!

Hi Nazaruddin, I was afraid you might mean that. I have looked at the YouTube videos and don't find any of them convincing. The acid test of such systems is - can they (1) be replicated and still work (2) be supported by theory that is not inconsistent with all other theories about energy (3) convince skeptics that they are exactly what they seem to be. A mistake I have seen more than once in such machines is the following. Some device is built and wired up and found to consume say 100W of power but produce absolutely zero output. The input is then increased to say 120W and the device starts producing 40W of output. The claim is that the device has mysteriously created 20W of output from nothing; but a MUCH better explanation is that its efficiency has increased from zero to 25%, which is still miserable for any electrical machine. No, none of these devices is convincing. I only wish they were!

Dear Tony Maine

Please have a look this demo in TU Delft...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5K_wB-xsuM

Many of the bloggers who viewed the Yildiz motor video seemed to think it was a fake! I want to know what the theory is behind it. Just taking it partly to pieces and reassembling it is not convincing. Can the inventors please publish a detailed description plus a theory of how it works that is not inconsistent with all our other theories about energy?

It's unbelievable

Maybe it is not unbelievable, but unlogicable or undescribeable, for this time being....

In order to obtain a rotating motion a turning field has to be generated if the rotor has PM. Looking at the demonstration I DO NOT BELIEVE that this has been done without a clever trick. A second remark is that in order to obtain an effect energy MUST flow from a high potential level to a lower. The interaction of PM is between constant fields there is not energy displacement as it should be.

With magnets which do not change their position it is not possible to generate a turning field.

This can be done if on the PM field a secondary field is added and thus the rotating field variation is generated.

Somewhere, well hidden, in the different parts must be a power source which is controlled in a clever way.

Who believes should also justify why he believes and some body with high skills should be able to find an explanation.

Nazaruddin,

How do I think of this?

P.T. Barnum said it best.

Noether's theorem would have to be overturned first.

Of course, I do not deny the possibility of drawing energy from some source that is at present unknown to us. But the ex-nihilo creation of energy with no corresponding deficit somewhere is, I think, nonsense of the first order.

Thanks James Garry

Yes, I also do not believe of ex-nihilo creation of energy or mass. Maybe something there invisible. What about the creation of energy from a mass in nuclear energy?

Naruddin,

In that particular case there is a clear 'accounting' for the origin of that energy, and nothing is created without limit.

I think, maybe there are invisible energy in the "Free Energy System" that we still could not explain.....

" Head of Efficiency and Energy Conservation Laboratory"

Dear Nazaruddin Sinaga you are in a very high position in the field of energy conservation. How would you imagine a "hidden energy" ?

This would be a VERY interesting point of view and would make us thinking further.

Your opinion could be of great value since you are at the top in this field.

It is "hidden" or "invisible" because it still could not proof scientifically. It is just like energy in the air. There was many kinds energy we could find in the atmosphere, such as electromagnetic, sound, heat, magnetic, electric, etc. I have tried to capture energy from the air with a simple electronic circuit. It is real and could be measured, and I utilized it to power up a small fan and LED lamps. I also made an experiments with magnetic and electronic circuits. It also worked.

However, I could not explain it scientifically.

That's why I said it as "hidden" or "invisible".....

Now I am working to explain it with the principle of Energy Conservation Law to include some possible energy types that maybe exist in our globe...

What you did is HARVEST electromagnetic waves energy present in "the air" due to a lot of electromagnetic sources as radio, TV or other "emitters". Of course it worked IoT is in some respect based on such "harvesters".

For a sensor I will have in development I shall use a "thermal" generator which will use a temperature difference between 2 available sources, the electrical energy obtained will be saved and used for the sensor and its electronic module.

Those energies are not "hidden",but we cannot "feel" them with our usual "receptors".

If you "harvest" too much - for instance - from a radio-wave carrier you will reduce the signal intensity and thus reduce also the reception quality of "normal" receivers" may be even the range.

I do not understand why it cannot be proved scientifically.

Please explain I would highly appreciate.

I can not proof it in energy balance, quantitatively. Please help me friend....

Hi Nazaruddin, Would you be able to share the details of your device that you used to "capture energy from the air" as you put it. I too would be very interested in what you did. Let us all see if it can be 'explained scientifically'. Presumably that means in accordance with current thought and the 'Standard Model'. But I don't believe that nature bows to the standard model. That is a human construction based on limited observation.

Nazaruddin,

Is the concept like this?

https://www.digikey.ca/en/articles/techzone/2015/oct/rf-energy-harvesting-batteries-not-included

I found an interesting paper on the harvesting from a not yet used energy source:

- the snow!

You could it consider "hidden" but it is not the case since it was available but not yet used.

Bring a detailed sketch of your device as was suggested it will be a good basis for further discussions.

Does it go in the direction the digikey paper describes ?

What do you understand by the "quantitative balance" mentioned above ?

Dear Researchers,

Have a nice weekend with your family....

Hi Nick, I was very intrigued to read of the snow tribo electric generator. I don't think snow or water droplet triboelectricity is at all well understood. If even 1 part per billion of the water molecules gave up an electron to an adjacent object, the attractive force seeking to re-unite them would be colossal. Electromagnetism is about 39 orders of magnitude stronger than gravity so the force produced is going to be about 10^30 times greater than their mutual gravitational attraction.

So what's going on?

It is question of SNOW not of WATER. As far as temperatures are low enough snow does not melt even under pressure so that it is a solid state material.

Hi Nazaruddin, Would you be able to share the details of your job. We don't know everything about our world. Can we get more details

Thank you very much dear all for your nice comments...

Dear respected scholars, please join our important and interesting discussion at:

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Do_you_agree_if_we_create_an_international_organization_of_university_lecturers#view=5e3cbc1e2ba3a1a3a972a2d2

We are discussing about creating an international organization of lecturers and researchers for us. I think you would like to be a member or organizer.

Thank you very much.

Best regards.