25 February 2019 9 701 Report

The relaxation factor can speed up the calculation. In a passive air cooling simulation of the battery pack, I used the default parameter value (0.99) afforded by STAR-CCM+, but the temperature of battery pack is always rising and cannot be stabilized. But when I changed the parameter to 0.5, the temperature curve became stable.

  • Did I affect the accuracy of the experimental results?
  • Why are there two different results?
  • How can I make the model keep the temperature constant when the relaxation factor is 0.99? In other words, is the difference between the two results related to the model itself?
  • As shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, the relaxation factor is changed in 970s, the oscillation of the residual is also reduced. The temperature is also balanced.

    According to the experience of your research, what range of relaxation factor can make the simulation get better results?

    Thank you!

    More Wang Peng's questions See All
    Similar questions and discussions