Besides extracting the poorly crystalline Fe- and Al-(hydroxy)oxides, does 0.2 (M) ammonium oxalate-oxalic acid (pH 3.25) buffer extract poorly crystalline Mn-oxides too?
Aromatic nitriles are versatile intermediates in organic chemistry, serving as precursors to amines, amides, and carboxylic acids among other functional groups. The selective reduction of these nitriles to primary amines in the presence of other functional groups like OH requires careful consideration of reagents and conditions to achieve high selectivity and yield. The challenge is compounded by the resonance stabilization of the nitrile group when attached to an aromatic system, which can impede reduction. Additionally, the presence of an OH group introduces the risk of over-reduction or side reactions, necessitating a strategy that can accommodate both functionalities without necessitating protection of the OH group.
Methodologies for Reduction
1. Catalytic Hydrogenation
Catalytic hydrogenation using hydrogen gas (H₂) and a palladium catalyst (Pd/C) is a widely adopted method for reducing nitriles to primary amines. However, the effectiveness of this method in the presence of an OH group and an aromatic nitrile can vary based on the substrate and catalyst used. Palladium on carbon (Pd/C) under mild conditions can offer a route to selectively reduce the nitrile without over-reducing the OH group, though the reaction may require optimization of pressure and temperature to achieve the desired selectivity (Rylander, 1979).
2. Chemoselective Reduction Agents
Selective reduction agents such as Nickel Boride (Ni2B), formulated by the in situ reaction of Nickel Chloride (NiCl₂) with Sodium Borohydride (NaBH₄), have shown promise in reducing nitriles to amines while preserving other functional groups like OH (Girard et al., 1998). This method leverages the chemoselectivity of nickel boride for the nitrile functionality, potentially offering a viable pathway for selective reduction in complex molecules.
3. Transfer Hydrogenation
Transfer hydrogenation represents an alternative strategy, using formic acid or ammonium formate as hydrogen donors in the presence of a suitable catalyst, such as Ru, Rh, or Ir complexes. This approach has been successful in reducing aromatic nitriles to primary amines under relatively mild conditions, with the potential for high selectivity (Casey et al., 2007). The compatibility of transfer hydrogenation with various functional groups, including OH, makes it an appealing option for selective reductions.
4. Avoidance of Protective Groups
The strategic avoidance of protective groups is a guiding principle in the design of reduction methodologies. While protective group strategies can offer a route to selective reductions, they introduce additional synthetic steps, increasing the complexity and time required for the synthesis. The methods outlined above represent approaches that, in principle, obviate the need for protecting the OH group, thereby streamlining the synthetic process.
References
- Rylander, P. N. (1979). Hydrogenation Methods. Academic Press.
- Girard, C., Onen, E., Aufort, M., Beauviere, S., Samson, E., & Charette, A. B. (1998). Nickel Boride, a Versatile Reducing Agent. Journal of Organic Chemistry, 63(23), 8108-8109.
- Casey, C. P., Singer, S. W., Powell, D. R., Hayashi, R. K., & Kavana, M. (2007). Transfer Hydrogenation Catalyzed by Chiral Rhodium Complexes: Enantioselective Reduction of Aromatic Nitriles. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 129(20), 6477-6484.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Biochemistry
- Biochemical Techniques
- Analytical Chemistry
- pH