Peripheral learning means to benefit from the environment around you. So, how the teacher can exploit the classroom environment for his students understanding? This is the main point as I think.
Teaching is an art. So, teachers can use all the available resources to help students understand. Concerning peripheral learning, the teacher can create attractive classroom environment that is full demonstrations and teaching aids. Thank you so much dear Dr for your cooperation.
Education is a daunting task if implemented entirely within classrooms and educational buildings. Therefore, the educational activities that take place outside these buildings, which include all classifications of non-class activity, helps to improve the educational outputs, achieve greater achievements and motivation of the student towards education, while developing the personality of the student and his behavior when he is in direct contact with different sectors of society.
According to Lozanov (1978), peripheral learning is regarded as learning from the environment in which the learners are experiencing their learning In point of fact, it is believed that students can indirectly learn a lot of things from what they see around them. For example, in the classroom setting, some of the language input are presented in the form of posters or other types of visual realia which have a secondary role since learners are not supposed to study them. The main pedagogical utility of the peripheral input is to trigger the 'paraconscious' part of the mind, which is responsible for things that help learning, but exist outside of our conscious attention.
I do not test peripheral learning. If students do not warn of such a possibility, then it is not correct either. As part of the test, such questions may also be posed, but it should not negatively affect the rating. Questions in this direction can give information how many students are interested in the observed issue, or have they met before with something similar ...