I have dug through several threads on RG and found various opinions on this, but it appears that overall, doing qPCR comparison across tissues is messy business, because the more tissue types you have, the more difficult it is to find a stably expressed housekeeping across all tissues. Thus, I am considering simply doing a 2^-Ct expression of my data. I understand I would not have a normalization here, but this may be the best I can do (unless, of course, I ran a standard curve).

Could you all comment on this and/or provide papers where you have seen the 2^-Ct method used?

FYI, the end of the Livak et al. paper which originally described 2^ddCt states: "The endpoint of real-time PCR analysis is the threshold cycle or CT. The CT is determined from a log–linear plot of the PCR signal versus the cycle number. Thus, CT is an exponential and not a linear term. For this any statistical presentation using the raw CT values should be avoided….. Converting the individual data to a linear form using 2^-CT more accurately depicts the individual variation among replicate reactions……  Finally, statistical data should be converted to the linear form by the 2^-CT calculation and should not be presented by the raw CT values."

More Joshua Preston's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions