These values are quite large and unusual for copper complexes, are you sure you have no error in frequency determination or did you use any standard for g determination?
Oleg is correct. D9 complexes tend to have one g value very close to 2. Either you have a calibration error, easily detected by running a weak pitch error, or you have something more interesting than a simple copper complex, perhaps a spin coupled multimer,
You have rather compressed octahedron, which for CuII-complexes is very unusual. It would be interesting to confirm this by independent method. A correlation with magnetochemical data would be very valuable.
Please pay attention to papers below, where there is found elongated Oh geometry for CuIIX4Y2 chromophores.
[1] Polyhedron, 19, 2000, 1843-1848, Complexes of Cu(II) with α-[(ethylamino)methyl]-3-hydroxy, benzenemethanol. Crystal structure of the mononuclear Cu(II) complex with Effortil, Bontchev, P., Ivanova, B., Bontchev, R., Mehandjiev, D., Ivanov, D.
[2] Polyhedron, 20, 2001, 231-236, Complexes of Cu(II) with 1-(4-amino-6,7-dimethoxy-2-quinazolinyl)-4-(2-furanylcarbonyl)-piperazine (prazosin): Synthesis, properties, crystal structure, Bontchev, P., Ivanova, B., Bontchev, R., Mehandjiev, D.