In a spatial model for extreme wind speeds (2 sec gust) we get shape parameters between -0.9 and -1.5. Although achieved return values are very reasonable, the magnitude of the shape parameter seems weird. Rather than maximum likelihood, the parameter is modeled with respect to the Cramer von Mises criterion. So the usual constraint for shape less than -1 that make maximum likelihood estimators unlikely to be obtained does not apply. Can anybody comment on such low shape parameters? Is there a (funded) argumentation for accepting or refusing such values?

More Harald Schellander's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions