I am performing RT PCR for detection of tuberculosis. I am using Taqman Probe. I am not getting amplification. There is no curve line which cross the threshold line even in a positive sample.
Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is one of the many variants of polymerase chain reaction or PCR. This laboratory technique is widely used in molecular biology in order for the scientists to produce multiple copies of a particular DNA sequence through a process coined as “amplification.” The difference of RT-PCR from traditional PCR is that RNA is first transcribed in reverse into its DNA complement which utilizes the reverse transcriptase. The new complementary DNA containing the reversed transcription will then be amplified using the traditional PCR or real-time PCR.
Most students studying this process often make a mistake of interchanging reverse transcription PCR and real-time PCR as the two are abbreviated similarly. To avoid confusion, biologists label the real-time PCR as quantitative real-time PCR or qPCR.
QPCR differs greatly from RT-PCR because the qPCR is responsible for measuring the amplification as it occurs. It can be said that RT-PCR starts the amplification process while the qPCR measures it as the procedure takes place.
Difference Between RT-PCR and QPCR | Difference Between | RT-PCR vs QPCR http://www.differencebetween.net/science/difference-between-rt-pcr-and-qpcr/#ixzz2z94WYbV1
Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is one of the many variants of polymerase chain reaction or PCR. This laboratory technique is widely used in molecular biology in order for the scientists to produce multiple copies of a particular DNA sequence through a process coined as “amplification.” The difference of RT-PCR from traditional PCR is that RNA is first transcribed in reverse into its DNA complement which utilizes the reverse transcriptase. The new complementary DNA containing the reversed transcription will then be amplified using the traditional PCR or real-time PCR.
Most students studying this process often make a mistake of interchanging reverse transcription PCR and real-time PCR as the two are abbreviated similarly. To avoid confusion, biologists label the real-time PCR as quantitative real-time PCR or qPCR.
QPCR differs greatly from RT-PCR because the qPCR is responsible for measuring the amplification as it occurs. It can be said that RT-PCR starts the amplification process while the qPCR measures it as the procedure takes place.
Difference Between RT-PCR and QPCR | Difference Between | RT-PCR vs QPCR http://www.differencebetween.net/science/difference-between-rt-pcr-and-qpcr/#ixzz2z94WYbV1
Maulik, if you give us more information about what you have done: methods/ kits used, controls tested, PCR program etc. we may be able to advise. There are many potential pitfalls in realtime PCR
I isolate DNA form Sputum sample using Alcohol:NAOH methods, with Spin column technology. The same DNA i used for RT PCR for just screening purpose. RT PCR, i am not using any KIT, but i prepared my on master mix (dNTPs (10mM) , Taq Pol, Taq Buffer (with MgCl2), Primers (5 µM) & Probe (5 µM), Water). But i am facing problem with results. I attached file of my results. RT PCR machine SmartCyclar 2 (cepheid).
For taqman probe to fluoresce, you need to measure after extension of the primer so 55oc would not be high enough. 72oC is too high. Normally a two step program is used 95oC (denature) 60oC anneal and extend then read fluorescence. You should firstly check that your primers are giving a product on a gel.
I already tried two step cycle , but facing the same problem,. One more thing i would like to know is that, i am using IMP (30%) + 2% NaOH for sputum sample processing . so can IPA inhibit the Amplification reaction or block PCR?
If you are finding a product when you run PCR sample on the gel then your DNA template is good. I presume you are purifying the DNA with phenol- chloroform and ethanol precipitation to remove anything that may interfere with PCR so you don't need to worry about NaOH etc. You could run the sample on the gel after running in your realtime machine to check everything is OK with the machine. That would suggest something is wrong with your taqman probe or your machine is not set up to read fluorescence correctly. Do you have another gene to check such as a control gene also with taqman probe to check the machine? If machine is OK, next to look at your probe. Did you design yourself or are these primers and probes published? I would guess TB detection by taqman would be a well established technique and publications would have the PCR conditions in the materials and methods. If it is still not working then I would suspect a problem with the probe and have it resynthesised.