PCR is a very powerful tool but also has some drawbacks. In particular, the need for a thermal cycler is a major limitation if you have to buy it upfront (as in a newly established laboratory). Other methods are available, such as NASBA and LAMP, that use simple thermostats to work.

Why is PCR still so popular?

Are there some specific characters that make it superior or is there a historical reason? (perhaps it was the first molecular method and it was introduced before the isothermal alternatives and it is now unfeasible to move to other systems...)

Thank you

More Luigi Marongiu's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions