Hi dear

As I understand the question of the Astral program In the Astral program, the quotation marks are placed between the brackets so that the program does not prepare them,

Documented quotations can be misrepresented to imply a source of information when in fact the information does not explicitly occur in the reference material, and might have been essentially obtained from some other source that was not given credit.  

There are a number of commonly occurring faults in scholarly writing associated with failure to give credit where credit is due. Also there are arguments about what credit is due to which source. For this reason the Wikipedia project publishes useful guidelines for writers and quality reviewers. Research Gate has a more difficult task because Wikipedia only accepts content that has already been published elsewhere, while RG accepts unpublished results.

According to the software I use, plagiarism is defined as "unoriginal text".  So once, an unoriginal text is detected, it gets highlighted whether it is properly quoted or not quoted. Therefore, it does alert you to this fact and you have to deal with it manually. It does that to your own self-citation. 

Thank you so much Dr. Decker. I appreciate your rich answer. 

Liqaa 

 Dear Dr. Salem 

Thank you so much for your rich clarification. It seems as you said, a matter of " unoriginal texts " .

Liqaa 

Well, I totally agree with Salem A Beshyah. His answer is convincing.

You are right dear Dr.Arwa.  I agree with you. 

Liqaa 

Hi dear 

I agree totally with dr.Salem Beshyah. Thank you for this important question.

I do a lot of copyediting for Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences being one of the editors.  I have recently acquired a GRAMMARLY Editor software, and I found very helpful for editing my own and other people's work.  While our mind may be focused on the contents, we may slip into the language errors. The 150 USD or so I paid for the license are money well spent. I suggest doing the revision in two stages, firstly clear all obvious errors using the software and secondly do the manual changes. If the paper has been shared with others, redo the software check at the last stage.   For the plagiarism, of course, we can not avoid using other people's expressions, but whenever the alert comes up, I first double check that I have actually quoted the right article which is shown by the software and secondly, I revise the section accordingly.  I strongly recommend such software and similar ones for saving time and effort.

Dear Dr. Salem 

Thank you so much for this valuable information. I appreciate your comment in this question. 

Liqaa 

In the beginning it must be noted that when examining research from academic fraud or as it known(Plagiarism tester) the questionnaire and the list of sources are not included in the examination for two reasons:

First it may be for earlier studies( previous studies) and the second that most references are sources for ( previous studies)originally

Also there is a technical problem that most researchers have in their possession of the program when they examine their research works by  themselves, when they do that 

this research works becomes a part of large database and when it is officially re-examined there is a percentage of fraud or plagiarism.

with my best wishes 

Dear Salam Jassim Hmood 

Thank you so much for your answer. If you never mind, You can read the first comment of Dr.Salem for more information about the originality of the text.

Liqaa 

Dear Likaa 

I know that but my answer was in general also the documented quotations is Included in my comment

Accept my respect

hi dear

i think this link can help you

https://www.plagiarism.org/assets/downloads/complete_resources.doc

Hi dear

As I understand the question of the Astral program In the Astral program, the quotation marks are placed between the brackets so that the program does not prepare them,

Dear Dr.Salam 

I understand what you mean and I agree with you but what I meant is the more of clarification . You're most welcome. 

Liqaa 

Hi dear Haifa 

Thank you so much for sharing this link. Appreciate your efforts. 

Liqaa 

Thanks a lot dear Dr. Asim. The problem usually more than a qautation marks .

Liqaa 

You are more welcome 

Dear Liqaa 

I agree with the opinion of Salam ... I would like to add that the decision to determine academic plagiarism is not limited to software programs, but ultimately needs the opinion of people with expertise and experience. 

Thank you so much Dr.Amer Ali Al-Atwi  for your valuable answer. I absolutely agree with you. 

Liqaa 

In the Web article "The Limitation of Every Plagiarism Checker" (https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2011/12/07/the-limitation-of-every-plagiarism-checker/), the following explanation is given:

"Common Phrasing/Attributed Use: […], though many plagiarism checkers will make an attempt to separate out attributed use, given the variety of attribution styles it isn’t always possible. Also, given how common some phrases are in the English language, many plagiarism checkers will report matches that are actually just coincidence."

Dear Tatsuo Tabata 

Thank you so much for sharing this valuable information. Yes, I think many times become a matter of coincidence. 

Liqaa

I think the comments are very important and beneficial. Thank you.

Thank you so much for your participation dear.

Liqaa 

Different software gives different percentage but they are within tolerance.

Dear Dr. Mohammed Aljaradin 

I agree with you that sometimes it is a matter of the plagiarism checker itself. 

Thank you so much for your answer. 

Liqaa 

You are right dear Dr. Anirbid. 

Thank you so much for your answer. 

Liqaa 

Very good question dear dr.Liqaa

Dear Dr.Khansaa 

Thank you so much for your answer.  You are utterly right.  This question is very important and we all need it in our researches. 

Liqaa 

I think this link will be very helpful to you. 

https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65163/is-verbatim-copying-of-short-technical-phrases-without-quotes-but-with-citation

A very helpful link dear Khansaa Hassan Al-Bahadli.  Thank you so much for sharing this information. 

Liqaa