I’ve seeded 6-well, 12-well, and 100mm dishes and continually find a heterogeneous distribution of my microvascular endothelial cells (primary cell line), regardless of seed density or technique used to deposit them in the plate. For example, I’ve tried creating a “stock” solution of DMEM, 10% FBS + cells and used both plastic serological pipets and micropipetters to deposit the correct amounts into each well or dish (to the center of the well, on the side, and in multiple locations have been tried). I’ve also tried adding media first, then adding cells dropwise around the well. All techniques continually, but not always, yield overconfluent centers and subconfluent edges. There is a graduate student in my lab who has experienced the same issue; however, there is also a lab tech with a great deal more experience than either of us who does not (although on rare occasions she may get overconfluent edges and subconfluent centers). Any suggestions as to what could be causing this?
I’ve made a list of possible explanations but don’t know if any of these could explain my results:
1. Shaking the dish immediately after seeding causes the cells to aggregate in the center
2. Incubator shelves are not level
3. I’m using Corning Cell-bind 6-well and 12-well plates. Is there an issue with uneven distribution of whatever treatment the wells are given (I believe they treat the polymer instead of coating it with something)? Is this plate incompatible with 10% FBS or higher? …however, a different company manufactures my 100mm dishes and this problem seems to arise there as well, so I tend to discount this.
4. Improper splitting, seeding technique causes this problem (such as depositing cell stock on the edges of the well instead of at the center or all around) – probably most likely issue
5. The filter I’m using to remove cell clumps before seeding does not remove all clumps; clumps tend to aggregate in the center of the well, growing somewhat faster than single cells on the periphery
6. Passage number issue: cells have adapted to the plastic and bind in weird ways (all of my experiments have been conducted using passage 9 and above – usually between 13 and 20)
7. Latent contamination of the cell line depletes something in the media, causing weird growth pattern
8. Use of plastic pipettes instead of glass serological pipets
9. Size of the pipette opening (1ml micropipetter or 5ml serological) causes this issue
10. At some step in the past, the cell line became too acidic, causing this weird growth pattern down the line
11. Initial seed density is too high for wells (300K for 6-well, for example). I tend to discount this.
12. Something I’m doing causes a physical deformation of the wells – extremely unlikely, I think.