RG

I prefer Research Gate

RG

RG

I have tried both RG is more interactive.

I prefer RG

for me RG

Am in line with Hetal Bhinde ; RG is also about interaction, while academia is much more like a repository, but a very good one.

RG

Academia is not interactive but they are trying to make researcher pages for some amount annually , I keep getting offers :(

I prefer ResearchGate.

Both are good for researchers, but RG is more popular because of RG score and recently introduced metric Total Research Interest (TRI).

Please also take a look at the following RG discussion threads.

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Would_you_recommend_researchgate_or_academiaedu

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Research_Gate_or_Academiaedu

https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_are_your_impressions_on_ResearchGate_versus_Academiaedu_versus_Mendeley12

RG is more comprehensive and can be used for both research and academia as well.

I also prefer RG

I think both are good platforms, academic social networks, for researchers. Probably in Academia one can find more reliable sources of documents, because, I think, they are more tide with strong research institutions, like research centres and high ranked universities, specially in USA. But at the same time, I realize that I don't have enough information to confirm that statement.

Researchgate, on the other hand, is more interactive, more collaboration and communication oriented. Services in RG are free, while in Academia several of them are payment based. Being both classified as academic social networks, RG, from my point of view, is more SOCIAL, correspondingly with current trends in Education and Science related activities.

If in virtual education there is a concept, PLE (personal learning environment), in other activities, like research, with strong dependency on online interaction and communications, there should be the concept of PWE (personal working environment; even, in the given case, could be specified as PRE, personal research environment), and in the PWE of every researcher there should coexist both tools; there are not "silver bullets" (except in the World of vampires...).

Search for your own papers on the web. I find the Acedemia site much more in the links. Therefore, although RG is more interactive to participants, the acedemia site provides better exposure to data miners.Semantic scholar site is good too for data miners.

To tell you the truth, I do not have any experience with Academia.edu, so I prefer Researchgate.

Best wishes,

Litart

Academia.edu

I have and use them both

Research Gate

التالية

سؤال مثير للاهتمام شكرا لكم

RG более удобна для обмена мнениями.

I choose RG. is more interesting than it.

RG

Very interesting question and an answers.

I prefer RG

I use them both, but I prefer RG. It requires a more active participation; it is easier exchange information between researchers; I don't have to pay nothing to know my readers, institutions, etc.

Researchgate of course. It is free and the interactions is motivate a lot.

Of course, RG needs activities and participation in additional is more easier.

As of now, majority of researcher are more interested in RG because of

1. Its is interactive

2. Easier

3. Question and answers / discussion

4. more social

5. RG & TRI scoring

Agreed Ajay Shukla

RG

RG is very important to many features

The Academy is also good and has its advantages

And you are more extensive and more widely used

The second is more specialized and less used

The first is fun

The second duty

For me, researchgate is enough and interesting!

RG

I agree with Ajay's answer!

I used both and prefer RG.

Of course RG is better than academia.edu for many reasons; the interaction between researchers; You can create projects and their parts, they have many types of documents to upload from preprint, data, articles, etc. can be a research manager, Academia.edu is also very good, the most important is the database of written work but as it is not very popular, its cost in the first world is good but for other areas it is very high.

RG

RG..

None of the commentators seem to appreciate the ability of other researchers to data mine for their papers. Putting a paper out doesn't stop until others read it.

RG seems to be increasing in this, but Acedemia.edu is still better.

John Hodge Thanks your opinion share, can you please elaborate how academia is better.

Thanks to other too

Nagwa Kassem Ashtar Saleh Adolfo Catral Sanabria Carine Temegne Nono Maham Muzamil Mohammad Mehdizadeh Tariq Almaliky Rzger A. Abdula Fares F. Fares Segun Michael Abegunde Carlos Alberto Matos Trindade Andrey Skorobogatov

RG. It gives me facebook flavour. But One thing i need to say, maybe, i am not sure, Academia charges an amount for premium user. Though i have no premium account.

RG=

RG is more interesting.

Rg is better

Obviously research gate.. Better than academia. Because lots of thing's we can do like create project, add conference work, publication expand rate is also high in research gate. It's like Facebook very easy to learn system operations. In short it is best platform for Researcher who want collaboration work from one country to another simple way to connect another researchers..

I have an account of each but I prefer RG for scholarly discussions like this.

RgG has a better way of monitoring your achievements and you got to see the profile of who is reading your articles unlike academia that you need to pay to see the individuals reading your paper. But it is easier to create an account in academia.

Definitely RG

Does anyone know this other platform https://www.growkudos.com ?

RG

Obviously research gate

I prefer R gate

Difinitly

وانا افضل بوبة البحث