Three basic Criteria:

1) New: Should be completely different from prior art (should be published or disclosed ever anywhere!);

2) Non-obvious: Should be newer for the person Skilled in art as well as should be reproducible by person skilled in art;

3) Industrial Applicable: Should be useful to society/industry...

From these criteria you can definitely say that your work shouldn't published anywhere before you FILE a patent...

I fully agree. I would just add 4) don't try to write the patent yourself - they are NOT just tweaked research papers.

First thing, it is not 'work' that is patented; works are copyrighted. What is patented is 'patentable inventions from your research work/innovation i.e. the inventions that would also qualify three basic criteria - novelty, inventive step (non-obviousness), and industrial applicability (usefulness in commerce and industry). It is only the claimable part (stated under the section 'claims' in the patent document) over which you can be entitled exclusive commercial rights for 20 years in the country where you apply for the patent. Regarding publication of your research work, once you apply for a patent you automatically secure a global priority date for the said invention (once the fees are paid and receipt is issued from patent office). You can also file an early publication fee and prepare the manuscript of the research paper simultaneously. Send it for publication as soon as your patent application is published. Otherwise also if you are careful enough in not disclosing your claims (what you mentioned in the patent application) in your research paper then you may send the manuscript for publication at any point of time after the filing of patent application.

It would still be desirable if you discuss with your patent attorney or patent Agent before submitting the research paper for publication.  

The answer to your "publishing" question depends on where you would like to apply for patent protection. Some countries (Europe, China, Japan, to name a few) have an absolute novelty requirement which means you cannot have disclosed the inventive concept (what will be claimed in the patent application) publicly, anywhere in the world, prior to filing for a patent (Note: some of the countries have narrow exceptions to this rule). Other countries (US, Canada, etc.) have a 12 month "grace period" which allows you to apply for a patent within 12 months after your idea has been revealed to the public. So you see, until you have identified the countries in which you would like to apply for patent protection it would be a good idea not to publish any enabling information.

I would echo the advice from Sudhir Kochar above, you should engage a patent agent or attorney who can help you develop a cogent patent strategy and understand the patent laws in your country as well as any others in which you would like to obtain protection. Doing this prior to publication will ensure you do not inadvertently render your idea patent-ineligible.

I agree with the criteria proposed by Professor Tejas Ganatra, on the 3 requirements of patentability: World novelty, inventive activity and industrial applicability, only that I would add some simple study on whether it is my marketable solution, if it could interest people, like so that the money that I am going to spend on applications will be returned to my pocket.

En español

Estoy de acuerdo con el criterio planteado por el profesor Tejas Ganatra, sobre los 3 requisitos de patentabilidad: Novedad mundial, actividad inventiva y aplicabilidad industrial, solo que añadiría algún estudio sencillo sobre si es mi solución comercializable, si pudiera interesarle a la gente, como para que el dinero que voy a gastar en solicitudes se me regrese al bolsillo.

Let me joke, but this case can not be treated differently. One more criterion should be common sense. This is an old thing, but worth reminding https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn965-wheel-patented-in-australia/

It is not a joke, friend Szymon Rubisz, it is a reality, the patent laws to be written must be reviewed very carefully, as they can leave some cracks where the smart ones can sneak. The issue of patentabilidated requirements should be treated according to proven international practice and not risk anything.

...

For granting the patent application, one have to fill-up three criteria such as the application (Invention/innovation) have (1) Novelty, (2) New inventive steps and (3) Utility .

Patent has a sense only in a purpose to put new product in the market.

A certificate on the protection of intellectual property rights for a new product ensures for the innovator the protected right of production and sale of an unlimited amount of pieces of a new product on a defined territory, and the right to transfer the production and/or sale for the whole or part of the market to another party by agreement on cession of the license.

Here I like to stress 2 strategies, that should only be understood as two ideas.

Strategy 1.

With regard to the production of the new product is obvious thus unauthorized production can be started by anyone, as soon as the product appear on sale. In that case the innovator can by agreement or legal action request compensation from an illegal producer. One example from history, among realized technical patents, containing the same practical principle was a little rotating lever, the can opener, often seen on old fashioned shoe polish cans, which was patented in this form. It is easy to copy it and to start own production. But before appeared on the market rotating lever had been patented and production without license had become illegal.

Strategy 2.

This form of protection is favorable for protection of the name of a new product that is produced in not obvious way, in view of the fact that only the innovator possesses the know-how for production. In this way unauthorized production is impossible, and a similar product is impossible to legally sell under the known name due to the fact that the name is protected. Trade Mark (TM) is a means of protecting intellectual property right that is granted for name, protective mark or logo, and not for the product to which the name refers. It is granted for a period of 10 years with the possibility of renewal for a further period of 10 years. Such a protected Trade Mark can last forever. A good example among realized protections was and still is very known name, Coca Cola, that was protected in this form containing the same practical model. Only inventor knows the recipe for production of the refreshing drink. So, nobody can produce the drink. Commercial name (Trade Mark) was protected and no other drinks can be legally produced or sold under protected name.

In order to charge royalty (both of the strategies) the innovator concludes an agreement with the producer on the cession of the license. For example, an agreement on the cession of a license defines the right of production for a period of 10 years and the producer guarantees annual production and sale of (for example) 20,000 pieces of new product for a defined territory, and to pay the innovator 0.60 Euro for each piece sold up until the end of each calendar year, otherwise the producer loses the right to the license. Thus the producer acquires the right to production and sale of the new product without competition and can form a higher price and better profit, while at the same time is exposed to pressure in order to achieve the agreed amount of production and sale as well as to pay the innovator and retain the license.

The answer was taken from added file and its cited literature, you may find on my profile also.

Regards, Petar