Yes I agree with Dr. Paul. Research conducted by the teacher himself including thesis guided by him. . Credit should be given if he has published books of high quality. No of research papers published and presented at international conferences.

In short, His API score is more important.

His teaching and opinion his students have for him is also a crucial criterion. How much concern he is for his students- how much time he devotes for them in making their career

Yes I agree with Dr. Paul. Research conducted by the teacher himself including thesis guided by him. . Credit should be given if he has published books of high quality. No of research papers published and presented at international conferences.

In short, His API score is more important.

His teaching and opinion his students have for him is also a crucial criterion. How much concern he is for his students- how much time he devotes for them in making their career

The award goes to teachers who meet the criterion that they support student learning through:

• Outstanding teaching efforts
• Acknowledged interest in, and commitment to, educational development of teaching
• Acknowledged pedagogical competence.

You should focus on this criterion when you nominate a teacher. Try to describe in your own words why you think your teacher meets the criterion and deserves the award. Bear in mind that nominations which are too short will not get past the first step in the selection procedure. The preferred amount of text is approximately 100 to 500 words. There is plenty of space for your text in the boxes in the nomination form. Just "scroll" down!

A teacher can be awarded more than once.

regards

Best teacher is who update him/herself with recent development in knowledge and then deliver it with great manner.

I agree with the submissions above.

Effective teaching, Up-to-date knowledge, Quality publications and research skill

Teachers are not supposed to expecting anything (may be publications) not any other awards , I am not for it ....

Based on the following characteristics but not limited to:

· Excellence in the Field of Study

· Respect for Your Students

· Generosity in Sharing Info

· A Sense of Humor

· cares deeply about her student and if the student actually learns something,

· eagerly engages in an exchange of ideas, thoughts, insights and encourages the student to ask questions,

· Cares if the learning process is exciting for the student.

Hello,

The criteria for evaluating teachers are multivarious and different academic institutions seem to use and rely on some rather than the others.However, I personally think that several criteria are required to give an objective picture of a particular teacher's professional status. The first and probably the most important criterion is teachers' attempts to attain intellectual growth and professional development Second, teachers should have their hands on action research which forms the basis of reflective teaching. Finally, teachers should know how to establish learner engagement and involvement by adopting a task based teaching whereby teacher/ student rapport , sharing and cooperation are quintessentially important.

Best regards,

R. Biria

The following are the criteria for best university teacher: 1. Pedagogic 2. Strong personality 3. Have excellent knowledge

I agree with dr.Hassan Nima and dr.Muhammad S.Irshad opinion.

Thank you so much dear Dr. Nada A Rasheed, for giving empasis on publication. l definetly agree eith you.

Purely on the feed back of the students

Agreed with all previous submissions

Student evaluation for the quality of teaching is a the first criteria because university is about teaching before research. Now , since the budget of universities depend heavily on money from industries, the amount of money the professor gets from industries indicates the quality of his research activities.

Scientific creativity and the achievement of new methods in education

Ability to elicit maximum learning outcomes in students both in teaching and research supervision.

Forefront in research, publications, giving of presentations and lectures that benefits the society

The importance of honesty and honesty in work - Honesty in the covenant and promise - Accuracy and order - Transparency in speech and action, as well as justice in rating grades - Advanced experience in teaching - Present the lesson in a way that is interesting scientifically and technically - The abundance of scientific material - Serialization The ability to manage the classroom and the quality of the lecture - taking into consideration individual differences - making room for discussion and dialogue - verbal interaction in a sound language and interesting expression - the use of various methods in evaluating student work - not to depart from the topic of the lecture.

Agree with@ Beemnet Mengesha Kassahun

Best wishes

Following

The links below can provide you with more detailed information on the issue.

http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789400752061

https://www.amazon.com/Practical-Guide-Mentoring-Coaching-Peer-networking/dp/0415317789

http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319016511

http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9781402020056

http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9781402018527

http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780792370932

I shall follow Dr K N Sheth' s answer.

The most important criterion is his popularity with the students because of excellent lectures which students can remember for a long time even without going through the class notes. Example: Late Prof. A K Sharma of Ballygunge Science College, Calcutta.

Bankole

Thanks for your valuable input

Bandyopadhyay Thanks for your valuable input

Chintal KUMAR Patel

Thanks for your valuable input

Baghbaderani

Thanks for your valuable input

Ahmed Mahdi

Thanks for your valuable input

Thanks for your valuable input

Khalid Al-Salhie

Nihad

Thanks for your valuable input

Adom

Thanks for your valuable input

Isam Issa Omran

Thanks for your valuable input

Dadach

Thanks for your valuable input

Asmaa

Thanks for your valuable input

Drlatief

Thanks for your valuable input

Kassahun

Thanks for your valuable input

Nada

Thanks for your valuable input

Abdulhay

Thanks for your valuable input

Raid M. Al-Ani

Thanks for your valuable input

Reza Biria

Thanks for your valuable input

Gupta

Thanks for your valuable input

Aparna

Thanks for your valuable input

Soyemi

Thanks for your valuable input

Irshad

Thanks for your valuable input

Nima

Thanks for your valuable input

Sheth

Thanks for your valuable input

Bankole

Thanks for your valuable input

The criteria for finding the best university teacher are: (1) research quality and (2) student satisfaction.

The quality of the research paper should be good enough and feedback of the students must be positive.

1. It is interesting to note how a number of the contributors have stressed the issue of research or publications of the teacher. I think that university teachers are not to be recognised by their research per se but most importantly how their research inform their teaching.

2. In addition to the research-informed teaching of the lecturer, one must also consider punctuality of the teacher.

3. Again, another criterion should be how the teacher is able to inspire his students to apply knowledge to solve real life issues. To add to this, I think that a teacher is good if he/she is able to inspire their students to link theory to practice.

Teaching, research, students feedback and community service

Research output, Teaching excellence and community service

Following

Knowledge, teaching quality, students satisfaction, and quality research should be the key criterion for best university teachers' awards.