05 November 2021 3 8K Report

I am confused about the method I found in the study. It does not state the type of mass analyzer I should use. Please help me understand this method:

Flavonoid analyses from FIII and from isolated flavonoids

were carried out on an HP 1100 liquid chromatograph

system equipped with a PDA detector (Agilent

Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) and interfaced with

a Finnigan LCQ (San Jose, CA) mass spectrometer

equipped with an API-ES ionization chamber. Separation

was performed on an AQUA C18 reverse phase column,

150  46 mm 5 lm (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) at

25 C, using 2.5% aqueous acetic acid (A), 2.5% aqueous

acetic acid–acetonitrile 90:10 (B) and acetonitrile (C) as

mobile phase. The gradient profile used was 0–100% B in

A (0–5 min), 0–15% C in B (5–30 min), 15–50% C in B

(30–35 min) and 50% C in B (35–40 min) isocratically, at

a flow rate of 0.5 ml min1. The first detection was done

with a PDA detector in a wavelength range 250–600 nm,

followed by a second detection in the mass spectrometer.

Mass analyses were obtained in the negative ion mode.

The mass spectrometer was programmed to perform three

consecutive scans: full mass (m/z 125–1500), MS2 of the

most abundant ion in the full mass and MS3 of the most

abundant ion in the MS2. Source voltage was 2.5 kV and

the capillary voltage and temperature were 10 V and

175 C. Nitrogen was used as sheath and auxiliary gas at

flow rates of 1.2 and 6 l/min, respectively. The normalised

energy of collision was 45%, using helium as collision gas.

Does it mean the author used a tandem MS since he did 3 consecutive scans? Also, if I use other mass analyzer how will it impact my readings? We only have a quadrople type of mass analyzer in the college I believe. Can I adjust this method to fit the instrument available?

Similar questions and discussions