Dear reserchers,
As you notice, it is the kind of results that DISTANCE software show after analyzing data (transect ID, calculated perpendicular distances and cluster size).
Plus, component percentage of detection probability and cluster size was 30.2% and 17.1%, respectively.
Any other information you all need, just let me know.
Thank you in advance.
See:
Biometrics 65, 225–236 DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01018.x March 2009
Estimating the Encounter Rate Variance in Distance Sampling
It might have been due to the spatial trends of the population? I hope this helps :-)
Andrew thank you,
I tried to access to the article, but it seems that it is not full-available online.
Do you have the entire article available?
I appreciate your contribution.
it seems that your data is highly skewed. try this approach
Article TO DETERMINE SKEWNESS, MEAN AND DEVIATION WITH A NEW APPROAC...
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematics
- Statistics